Balconi Michela, Allegretta Roberta A, Angioletti Laura
International research center for Cognitive Applied Neuroscience (IrcCAN), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Research Unit in Affective and Social Neuroscience, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo Gemelli 1, Milan, 20123 Italy.
Cogn Neurodyn. 2025 Dec;19(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s11571-024-10189-8. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
The metacognition of one's planning strategy constitutes a "second-level" of metacognition that goes beyond the knowledge and monitoring of one's cognition and refers to the ability to use awareness mechanisms to regulate execution of present or future actions effectively. This study investigated the relation between metacognition of one's planning strategy and the behavioral and electrophysiological (EEG) correlates that support strategic planning abilities during performance in a complex decision-making task. Moreover, a possible link between task execution, metacognition, and individual differences (i.e., personality profiles and decision-making styles) was explored. A modified version of the Tower of Hanoi task was proposed to a sample of healthy participants, while their behavioral and EEG neurofunctional correlates of strategic planning were collected throughout the task with decisional valence. After the task, a metacognitive scale, the 10-item Big Five Inventory, the General Decision-Making Style inventory, and the Maximization Scale were administered. Results showed that the metacognitive scale enables to differentiate between the specific dimensions and levels of metacognition that are related to strategic planning behavioral performance and decision. Higher EEG delta power over left frontal cortex (AF7) during task execution positively correlates with the metacognition of one's planning strategy for the whole sample. While increased beta activity over the left frontal cortex (AF7) during task execution, higher metacognitive beliefs of efficacy and less willingness to change their strategy a posteriori were correlated with specific personality profiles and decision-making styles. These findings allow researchers to delve deeper into the multiple facets of metacognition of one's planning strategy in decision-making.
对自身规划策略的元认知构成了元认知的“第二层次”,它超越了对自身认知的知识和监测,指的是运用意识机制有效调节当前或未来行动执行的能力。本研究调查了自身规划策略的元认知与行为及电生理(脑电图)相关因素之间的关系,这些相关因素在复杂决策任务的执行过程中支持战略规划能力。此外,还探讨了任务执行、元认知和个体差异(即人格特征和决策风格)之间的可能联系。向一组健康参与者提出了一个修改版的汉诺塔任务,同时在整个任务过程中收集他们具有决策效价的战略规划的行为和脑电图神经功能相关因素。任务结束后,进行了一个元认知量表、10项大五人格量表、一般决策风格量表和最大化量表的测试。结果表明,元认知量表能够区分与战略规划行为表现和决策相关的元认知的特定维度和水平。在整个样本中,任务执行期间左额叶皮层(AF7)较高的脑电图δ波功率与自身规划策略的元认知呈正相关。而在任务执行期间左额叶皮层(AF7)的β活动增加、较高的效能元认知信念以及事后改变策略的意愿较低,则与特定的人格特征和决策风格相关。这些发现使研究人员能够更深入地探究决策中自身规划策略元认知的多个方面。