Suppr超能文献

经胸三维高脉冲重复频率多普勒超声心动图对瓣膜反流的定量分析。

Quantification of valvular regurgitation by transthoracic 3D high pulse repetition frequency Doppler echocardiography.

作者信息

Berg Erik Andreas Rye, Fiorentini Stefano, Avdal Jørgen, Grenne Bjørnar, Stensæth Knut Haakon, While Peter Thomas, Espeland Torvald, Wiseth Rune, Torp Hans, Aakhus Svend

机构信息

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Prinsesse Kristinas gate 3, Trondheim 7030, Norway.

Clinic of Cardiology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Prinsesse Kristinas gate 3, Trondheim 7030, Norway.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract. 2024 Dec 18;2(3):qyae138. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyae138. eCollection 2024 Jul.

Abstract

AIMS

To improve quantification of valvular regurgitation, a 3D high-pulse repetition frequency Doppler (3D HPRFD) method was developed for regurgitant volume (RVol) estimation from transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Although successfully applied and in selected clinical cases, a systematic clinical validation of 3D HPRFD has not been published. Hence, our aims were to investigate (i) feasibility of 3D HPRFD and (ii) correlation between 3D HPRFD and RVol estimates obtained by the 2D proximal isovelocity surface area (PISA) method and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with either aortic regurgitation (AR) or mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 45 patients with AR (42% mild, 40% moderate, and 18% severe) and 45 with MR (67% mild, 24% moderate, and 9% severe). Median time between start of TTE and start of CMR was 1.5 h, minimizing changes in load. Overall feasibility of 3D HPRFD was 56% in AR and 44% in MR. Feasibility was only 25% in patients with severe regurgitation. In AR, estimated RVol from 3D HPRF did not correlate with estimated RVol from PISA or CMR [Spearman = 0.06 ( = 0.78) and 0.04 ( = 0.4), respectively]. In MR, RVol estimates from 3D HPRFD correlated with PISA ( = 0.72, < 0.001) but not with CMR ( = 0.31, = 0.43).

CONCLUSION

Regurgitant volume estimation by 3D HPRFD had a low feasibility, especially in severe regurgitation, and in general correlated poorly with PISA and CMR estimates. In its current state, 3D HPRFD is not ready for clinical use.

摘要

目的

为了改进瓣膜反流的定量分析,开发了一种三维高脉冲重复频率多普勒(3D HPRFD)方法,用于经胸超声心动图(TTE)评估反流容积(RVol)。尽管该方法已成功应用于某些临床病例,但3D HPRFD的系统临床验证尚未发表。因此,我们的目的是研究:(i)3D HPRFD的可行性;(ii)在主动脉瓣反流(AR)或二尖瓣反流(MR)患者中,3D HPRFD与通过二维近端等速表面积(PISA)法和心脏磁共振(CMR)获得的RVol估计值之间的相关性。

方法和结果

我们纳入了45例AR患者(42%为轻度,40%为中度,18%为重度)和45例MR患者(67%为轻度,24%为中度,9%为重度)。TTE开始与CMR开始之间的中位时间为1.5小时,以尽量减少负荷变化。3D HPRFD在AR患者中的总体可行性为56%,在MR患者中为44%。在重度反流患者中,可行性仅为25%。在AR患者中,3D HPRF估计的RVol与PISA或CMR估计的RVol不相关[Spearman相关系数分别为0.06(P = 0.78)和0.04(P = 0.4)]。在MR患者中,3D HPRFD估计的RVol与PISA相关(r = 0.72,P < 0.001),但与CMR不相关(r = 0.31,P = 0.43)。

结论

3D HPRFD评估反流容积的可行性较低,尤其是在重度反流患者中,并且总体上与PISA和CMR估计值的相关性较差。就目前的状态而言,3D HPRFD尚未准备好用于临床。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aa3f/11694712/370f0e2e09e0/qyae138f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验