El Arabi Mohamed Ashraf, Abu Shamaa Nabil, Elkilani Naglaa Shawki, Taha Rasha Mohamed
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez-Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
Department of Oral Medicine, Periodontology, Radiology and Laser Center Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
J Orthod. 2025 Sep;52(3):259-269. doi: 10.1177/14653125241309654. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
To compare microleakage beneath ceramic and metal brackets prepared with either acid etching or laser conditioning.
An in vitro study.
Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt.
A total of 40 intact human premolars were selected and divided into four equal groups. The groups received the same adhesive-application procedures with different surface treatments and type of brackets: groups 1 (AM) and 3 (AC) underwent phosphoric acid etching; groups 2 (LM) and 4 (LC) underwent laser enamel conditioning using a Er,Cr:YSGG laser. Metal brackets were then bonded to the teeth in groups 1 (AM) and 2 (LM) and ceramic brackets in groups 3 (AC) and 4 (LC). Subsequently, they were placed in fuchsin dye solution. Each premolar was sectioned longitudinally in the occluso-gingival direction at right angles to the brackets. The dye penetration depth was calculated using a stereomicroscope. Microleakage was measured along the enamel-adhesive interface at each section's gingival and occlusal levels. For group comparisons, the Tukey test was utilised as a post hoc test to determine statistical significance between groups. The independent sample -test was utilised for comparing both subgroups.
The results demonstrated significantly more microleakage under metal and ceramic brackets bonded to enamel prepared with laser conditioning than with acid etching at both the gingival and occlusal surfaces and in total. The AC group exhibited the lowest amount of microleakage, but the LC group demonstrated the highest amount of microleakage.
The ceramic bracket group treated with acid etching exhibited the lowest level of microleakage. Microleakage values on the gingival and occlusal surfaces were higher in both bracket types for the laser etched groups.
比较经酸蚀或激光预处理的陶瓷托槽和金属托槽下方的微渗漏情况。
一项体外研究。
埃及伊斯梅利亚苏伊士运河大学牙科学院正畸科。
总共选取40颗完整的人类前磨牙并将其分为四组。各组接受相同的涂粘结剂程序,但表面处理和托槽类型不同:第1组(AM)和第3组(AC)进行磷酸酸蚀;第2组(LM)和第4组(LC)使用铒铬:钇钪镓石榴石激光进行牙釉质预处理。然后在第1组(AM)和第2组(LM)的牙齿上粘结金属托槽,在第3组(AC)和第4组(LC)的牙齿上粘结陶瓷托槽。随后,将它们置于品红染料溶液中。每颗前磨牙均沿与托槽垂直的牙合龈方向纵向切开。使用体视显微镜计算染料渗透深度。在每个切片的牙龈和牙合面水平沿牙釉质 - 粘结剂界面测量微渗漏情况。对于组间比较,采用Tukey检验作为事后检验以确定组间的统计学显著性。采用独立样本t检验比较两个亚组。
结果表明,在牙龈和牙合面以及总体上,与酸蚀处理的牙釉质粘结的金属和陶瓷托槽下方的微渗漏明显更多。AC组的微渗漏量最低,但LC组的微渗漏量最高。
经酸蚀处理的陶瓷托槽组微渗漏水平最低。激光蚀刻组的两种托槽类型在牙龈和牙合面的微渗漏值均较高。