Adams Sophie, Trocki Olivia Maher, Miller Christina, Studwell Courtney, Bombalicki Meghan, Dobson Lori, Horan Sofia, Sargent Jordan, Duyzend Michael, Gray Kathryn J, Guseh Stephanie, Wilkins-Haug Louise
Center for Fetal Medicine and Reproductive Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Center for Advanced Molecular Diagnostics, Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Clin Chem. 2025 Jan 3;71(1):129-140. doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvae189.
Genetic screening has advanced from prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening for aneuploidies (cfDNA-ANP) to single-gene disorders (cfDNA-SGD). Clinical validation studies have been promising in pregnancies with anomalies but are limited in the general population.
Chart review and laboratory data identified pregnancies with cfDNA-SGD screening for 25 autosomal dominant conditions at our academic center. Screening was identified as routine by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 10 codes and chart review. Ultrasound anomalies or known family history of a condition on the panel were excluded. Retrospective chart review investigated test concordance, outcomes, and phenotypes.
cfDNA-SGD was completed for 3480/37 050 (9.4%) pregnancies, of which 2745 (78.9%) were for routine screening. Fourteen (0.51%, 14/2745) had high-risk results defined as pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants: 6 (0.22%) likely fetal variants, and 8 (0.29%) maternal variants with 50% risk for fetal inheritance. Diagnostic testing detected 6/6 fetal and 6/8 maternal cfDNA-SGD variants (2/8 pregnant individuals declined testing but had clinical features on physical exam). Variants were detected in 11/14 pregnancies/newborns and in 9/14 (64.3%) parents/gamete donors. There were no false positives identified by cfDNA-SGD; however, 2 variants were discrepantly classified between the cfDNA-SGD and diagnostic testing laboratories. All pregnancies had normal imaging and 9 had mild postnatal phenotypes. Three terminated pregnancy following diagnostic testing.
Our study demonstrated that 0.51% of routine cfDNA-SGD was high risk, prompting comprehensive evaluation for pregnancies and parents. Routine cfDNA-SGD allowed for early identification and intervention, but raises counseling challenges due to variable expressivity, limited genotype-phenotype correlations, and discrepant variant classification.
基因筛查已从用于非整倍体的产前游离DNA(cfDNA)筛查(cfDNA-ANP)发展到单基因疾病筛查(cfDNA-SGD)。临床验证研究在有异常的妊娠中前景良好,但在普通人群中有限。
通过病历审查和实验室数据确定在我们学术中心进行cfDNA-SGD筛查25种常染色体显性疾病的妊娠情况。根据国际疾病分类(ICD)10编码和病历审查将筛查确定为常规筛查。排除超声异常或检测 panel 上已知的疾病家族史。回顾性病历审查调查检测一致性、结局和表型。
37050例妊娠中有3480例(9.4%)完成了cfDNA-SGD,其中2745例(78.9%)为常规筛查。14例(0.51%,14/2745)有高风险结果,定义为致病/可能致病(P/LP)变异:6例(0.22%)可能为胎儿变异,8例(0.29%)为母亲变异,胎儿遗传风险为50%。诊断检测发现6/6例胎儿和6/8例母亲的cfDNA-SGD变异(2/8例孕妇拒绝检测,但体检时有临床特征)。11/14例妊娠/新生儿和9/14例(64.3%)父母/配子供体中检测到变异。cfDNA-SGD未发现假阳性;然而,cfDNA-SGD和诊断检测实验室之间有2个变异分类不一致。所有妊娠影像学检查均正常,9例有轻度产后表型。3例在诊断检测后终止妊娠。
我们的研究表明,0.51%的常规cfDNA-SGD为高风险,促使对妊娠和父母进行全面评估。常规cfDNA-SGD可实现早期识别和干预,但由于表达可变、基因型-表型相关性有限以及变异分类不一致,增加了咨询挑战。