Sanghvi Mihir M, Dhall Eamon, Chahal C Anwar A, O'Mahony Constantinos, Mohiddin Saidi A, Savvatis Konstantinos, Ricci Fabrizio, Munroe Patricia B, Petersen Steffen E, Aung Nay, Khanji Mohammed Y
William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
NIHR Barts Biomedical Research Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2025 Jan 2. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcae117.
In light of recent advances in imaging techniques, molecular understanding and therapeutic options in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), we performed a systematic review of current guidelines for the diagnosis and management of HCM in order to identify consensus and discrepant areas in the clinical practice guidelines.
We systematically reviewed the English language guidelines and recommendations for the management of HCM in adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched for guidelines published in the last 10 years. Following a systematic search, three guidelines on the diagnosis and management of HCM were identified, all of which were robustly developed (AGREE rigour of development score ≥50%). These guidelines were authored by the major European (ESC; 2023), American (AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR; 2024) and Japanese (JCS/JHFS; 2018) cardiovascular societies. There was broad consensus on echocardiographic recommendations, the medical and invasive management of HCM, the application of genetic testing and family screening, and exercise and reproductive recommendations in HCM. There were areas of variability in the definition and diagnostic criteria for HCM, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging recommendations and assessment of sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk and prevention strategies. Due to the JCS/JHFS guideline being older, there are no recommendations on the use of cardiac myosin ATPase inhibitors.
Contemporary guidelines for HCM achieve consensus across a broad range of criteria and recommendations concerning diagnosis and management. However, variations in the approach towards risk assessment for SCD exist between the guidelines. There are also more subtle differences concerning diagnostic criteria and the utility of late gadolinium enhancement for risk stratification, which will likely evolve as the evidence-base broadens.
鉴于肥厚型心肌病(HCM)在成像技术、分子理解和治疗选择方面的最新进展,我们对当前HCM诊断和管理指南进行了系统评价,以确定临床实践指南中的共识和分歧领域。
我们系统评价了英文的成人HCM管理指南和建议。检索了MEDLINE和EMBASE数据库中过去10年发表的指南。经过系统检索,确定了3项关于HCM诊断和管理的指南,所有这些指南都是经过严格制定的(AGREE制定严格度评分≥50%)。这些指南由欧洲主要心血管学会(ESC;2023年)、美国主要心血管学会(AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR;2024年)和日本主要心血管学会(JCS/JHFS;2018年)撰写。在超声心动图建议、HCM的药物和侵入性管理、基因检测和家族筛查的应用以及HCM的运动和生殖建议方面存在广泛共识。在HCM的定义和诊断标准、心血管磁共振(CMR)成像建议以及心源性猝死(SCD)风险评估和预防策略方面存在差异。由于JCS/JHFS指南较旧,没有关于使用心肌肌球蛋白ATP酶抑制剂的建议。
当代HCM指南在诊断和管理的广泛标准和建议上达成了共识。然而,各指南在SCD风险评估方法上存在差异。在诊断标准和钆延迟增强用于风险分层的效用方面也存在更细微的差异,随着证据基础的扩大,这些差异可能会演变。