Guadagnolo B Ashleigh, Miah Aisha
Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Radiotherapy and Physics, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;32(3):1489-1496. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16729-0. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
For patients with nonmetastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) who are at high risk of local recurrence, the standard of care for limb-conserving local management is combined radiotherapy and surgery. Radiotherapy for STS entails 5 weeks of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (25 × 2 Gy) preoperatively or 6 or more weeks postoperatively. There is growing interest in the use of preoperative hypofractionated regimes, viz. shorter courses with higher daily doses, for STS. Recent studies have investigated ultrahypofractionation (UHF, ≥ 5 Gy per fraction) and moderate hypofractionation (MHF, > 2 Gy but < 5 Gy per fraction) for STS. Regimens that are designed to be isoeffective for tumor control indeed result in equivalent local relapse-free survival. However, as the daily dose increases, the impacts to normal tissues and potential for toxicities increase owing to differences in fraction-size sensitivity between STS and normal tissues (e.g., skin, subcutaneous tissue, vascular structures, and bone). This article reviews the key studies informing the debate about hypofractionation for STS. We evaluate the current data that reveal relatively small patient cohorts, short follow-up time, and inconsistent toxicity reporting. A randomized, controlled investigation of conventional fractionation, MHF, and UHF is needed. The current phase 2 data confirm that any such study should have co-primary endpoints of both local relapse-free survival as well as immediate- and long-term toxicities because the fundamental question being investigated with significant increase in daily fraction size while maintaining isoeffective total dose (~ 50 Gy equivalent) is: what are the dose impacts to late-responding normal tissues that may result in decrements to physical functioning for patients?
对于有局部复发高风险的非转移性软组织肉瘤(STS)患者,保肢局部治疗的标准方案是放疗与手术联合应用。STS的放疗包括术前5周的常规分割放疗(25×2Gy)或术后6周及以上的放疗。目前人们越来越关注术前采用大分割放疗方案,即每日剂量更高但疗程更短的方案来治疗STS。近期研究探讨了STS的超分割放疗(UHF,每次分割剂量≥5Gy)和中等分割放疗(MHF,每次分割剂量>2Gy但<5Gy)。旨在实现等效肿瘤控制的方案确实能带来相当的局部无复发生存率。然而,随着每日剂量增加,由于STS与正常组织(如皮肤、皮下组织、血管结构和骨骼)在分割剂量敏感性上存在差异,对正常组织的影响及毒性发生的可能性也会增加。本文回顾了为STS大分割放疗争论提供依据的关键研究。我们评估了当前数据,这些数据显示患者队列相对较小、随访时间短且毒性报告不一致。需要开展一项关于常规分割放疗、MHF和UHF的随机对照研究。目前的2期数据证实,任何此类研究都应将局部无复发生存率以及近期和远期毒性作为共同主要终点,因为在保持等效总剂量(约50Gy等效剂量)的同时大幅增加每日分割剂量所研究的根本问题是:对晚期反应正常组织的剂量影响可能会导致患者身体功能下降的情况是怎样的?