Stubblefield William B, Helderman Ron, Strokes Natalie, Greineder Colin F, Barnes Geoffrey D, Vinson David R, Westafer Lauren M
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2452877. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52877.
Despite guideline recommendations to use low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) or direct oral anticoagulants in the treatment of most patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), US-based studies have found increasing use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) in hospitalized patients.
To identify barriers and facilitators of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study conducted semistructured interviews from February 1 to June 3, 2024, that were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed in an iterative process using reflexive thematic analysis. Interview participants were physicians in emergency medicine, hospital medicine (hospitalist), interventional cardiology, and interventional radiology. Participants were recruited using maximum variation sampling targeting UFH-dominant vs LMWH-dominant approaches in hospitalized patients with acute PE. We triangulated results with a group of interventional cardiologists and radiologists (interventionalists).
Common themes and factors associated with anticoagulant selection for hospitalized patients with acute PE. Reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify these themes and factors.
Of the 46 interviewees (median [IQR] age, 43 [36-50] years; 33 who identified as men [71.7%]), 25 (54.3%) were emergency physicians, 17 (37.0%) were hospitalists, and 4 (8.7%) were interventionalists. Each interview lasted a median (IQR) of 29 (25-32) minutes. Prominent themes associated with anticoagulant selection included agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, the inertia of learned practice, and therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation. Institutional culture and support were factors associated with choice of the dominant anticoagulation strategy. Additionally, factors associated with UFH use were fear of decompensation and misperceptions regarding the pharmacology of anticoagulants and catheter-directed treatments.
In this qualitative study, physicians across a spectrum of specialties and geographical settings reported common barriers and facilitators to the use of guideline-concordant anticoagulation in patients hospitalized with acute PE, particularly agnosticism regarding choice of anticoagulant, inertia of learned practice, therapeutic momentum after anticoagulation initiation, and institutional culture and support. Future implementation efforts may consider targeting these domains.
尽管指南建议在治疗大多数急性肺栓塞(PE)患者时使用低分子量肝素(LMWH)或直接口服抗凝剂,但美国的研究发现住院患者中普通肝素(UFH)的使用越来越多。
确定急性PE住院患者遵循指南进行抗凝治疗的障碍和促进因素。
设计、背景和参与者:这项定性研究于2024年2月1日至6月3日进行了半结构化访谈,访谈进行了录音、转录,并采用反思性主题分析的迭代过程进行分析。访谈参与者包括急诊医学、医院医学(住院医师)、介入心脏病学和介入放射学领域的医生。采用最大差异抽样法招募参与者,目标是在急性PE住院患者中采用以UFH为主与以LMWH为主的治疗方法。我们与一组介入心脏病学家和放射学家(介入专家)对结果进行了三角验证。
与急性PE住院患者抗凝剂选择相关的常见主题和因素。采用反思性主题分析来确定这些主题和因素。
46名受访者(年龄中位数[四分位间距]为43[36 - 50]岁;33名男性[71.7%])中,25名(54.3%)为急诊医生,17名(37.0%)为住院医师,4名(8.7%)为介入专家。每次访谈持续时间中位数(四分位间距)为29(25 - 32)分钟。与抗凝剂选择相关的突出主题包括对抗凝剂选择的不可知论、习得实践的惯性以及抗凝治疗开始后的治疗惯性。机构文化和支持是与主要抗凝策略选择相关的因素。此外,与UFH使用相关的因素包括对失代偿的恐惧以及对抗凝剂药理学和导管定向治疗的误解。
在这项定性研究中,来自不同专业领域和地理位置的医生报告了急性PE住院患者使用遵循指南的抗凝治疗的常见障碍和促进因素,特别是对抗凝剂选择的不可知论、习得实践的惯性、抗凝治疗开始后的治疗惯性以及机构文化和支持。未来的实施工作可考虑针对这些领域。