• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

裁决中的偏见:探究人工智能、媒体、金融和法律机构在追求社会正义方面的影响。

Bias in adjudication: Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence, media, financial and legal institutions in pursuit of social justice.

作者信息

Javed Kashif, Li Jianxin

机构信息

School of Law, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0315270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315270. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0315270
PMID:39752385
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11698438/
Abstract

The latest global progress report highlights numerous challenges in achieving justice goals, with bias in artificial intelligence (AI) emerging as a significant yet underexplored issue. This paper investigates the role of AI in addressing bias within the judicial system to promote equitable social justice. Analyzing weekly data from January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2023, through wavelet quantile correlation, this study examines the short, medium, and long-term impacts of integrating AI, media, international legal influence (ILI), and international financial institutions (IFI) as crucial factors in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 16 (SDG-16), which focuses on justice. The findings indicate that AI, media, ILI, and IFI can help reduce bias in the medium and long term, although their effects appear mixed and less significant in the short term. Our research proposes a comprehensive policy framework that addresses the complexities of implementing these technologies in the judicial system. We conclude that successfully integrating AI requires a supportive global policy environment that embraces technological innovation, financial backing, and robust regulation to prevent potential disruptions that could reinforce inequalities, perpetuate structural injustices, and exacerbate human rights issues, ultimately leading to more biased outcomes in social justice.

摘要

最新的全球进展报告凸显了在实现司法目标方面的诸多挑战,其中人工智能(AI)中的偏见成为一个重大但未得到充分探索的问题。本文研究了人工智能在解决司法系统中的偏见以促进公平社会正义方面的作用。通过小波分位数相关性分析2019年1月1日至2023年12月31日的每周数据,本研究考察了将人工智能、媒体、国际法律影响(ILI)和国际金融机构(IFI)作为实现可持续发展目标16(SDG - 16,聚焦司法)的关键因素进行整合的短期、中期和长期影响。研究结果表明,人工智能、媒体、ILI和IFI在中长期有助于减少偏见,尽管它们的影响在短期内显得参差不齐且不太显著。我们的研究提出了一个全面的政策框架,以应对在司法系统中实施这些技术的复杂性。我们得出结论,成功整合人工智能需要一个支持性的全球政策环境,该环境要包容技术创新、资金支持和有力监管,以防止可能强化不平等、使结构性不公正永久化并加剧人权问题的潜在干扰,最终导致社会正义中出现更多有偏见的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/3ba948b754c8/pone.0315270.g030.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/d305d4fe75d1/pone.0315270.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/a08ddf35af80/pone.0315270.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/d49bcbf445be/pone.0315270.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/cda2af540356/pone.0315270.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/92d592035ab7/pone.0315270.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6c0674d5e01b/pone.0315270.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/94db7f536389/pone.0315270.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/7be03861f0c1/pone.0315270.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/64eb3e79920c/pone.0315270.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6cb3cd9d0164/pone.0315270.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/16ae818c4506/pone.0315270.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6dab1a165156/pone.0315270.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/716a1745612f/pone.0315270.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/66c0a57fd642/pone.0315270.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/8ff246480399/pone.0315270.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/46082b6353d6/pone.0315270.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/7289e94199ca/pone.0315270.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/585736eb3284/pone.0315270.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/08edf33b5174/pone.0315270.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/d95f7f450c9e/pone.0315270.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/11b78c987b1f/pone.0315270.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/c24b31f61449/pone.0315270.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/80ffa7d74c11/pone.0315270.g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/bf1ae44f1e2b/pone.0315270.g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/15b5a9f9b4a2/pone.0315270.g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/70ad0165f78e/pone.0315270.g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6e65b5a0672f/pone.0315270.g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/7bb873e0bb60/pone.0315270.g028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/3ba948b754c8/pone.0315270.g030.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/d305d4fe75d1/pone.0315270.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/a08ddf35af80/pone.0315270.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/d49bcbf445be/pone.0315270.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/cda2af540356/pone.0315270.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/92d592035ab7/pone.0315270.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6c0674d5e01b/pone.0315270.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/94db7f536389/pone.0315270.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/7be03861f0c1/pone.0315270.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/64eb3e79920c/pone.0315270.g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6cb3cd9d0164/pone.0315270.g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/16ae818c4506/pone.0315270.g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6dab1a165156/pone.0315270.g012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/716a1745612f/pone.0315270.g013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/66c0a57fd642/pone.0315270.g014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/8ff246480399/pone.0315270.g015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/46082b6353d6/pone.0315270.g016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/7289e94199ca/pone.0315270.g017.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/585736eb3284/pone.0315270.g018.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/08edf33b5174/pone.0315270.g019.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/d95f7f450c9e/pone.0315270.g020.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/11b78c987b1f/pone.0315270.g021.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/c24b31f61449/pone.0315270.g022.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/80ffa7d74c11/pone.0315270.g023.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/bf1ae44f1e2b/pone.0315270.g024.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/15b5a9f9b4a2/pone.0315270.g025.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/70ad0165f78e/pone.0315270.g026.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/6e65b5a0672f/pone.0315270.g027.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/7bb873e0bb60/pone.0315270.g028.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4501/11698438/3ba948b754c8/pone.0315270.g030.jpg

相似文献

1
Bias in adjudication: Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence, media, financial and legal institutions in pursuit of social justice.裁决中的偏见:探究人工智能、媒体、金融和法律机构在追求社会正义方面的影响。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 3;20(1):e0315270. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315270. eCollection 2025.
2
Artificial Intelligence and global health: opportunities and challenges.人工智能与全球健康:机遇与挑战。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019 Nov 27;3(6):741-746. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20190106.
3
Artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication: Semantic biasness classification and identification in legal judgement (SBCILJ).司法裁判中的人工智能:法律判决中的语义偏差分类与识别(SBCILJ)
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 26;10(9):e30184. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30184. eCollection 2024 May 15.
4
Artificial intelligence for sustainable oral healthcare.人工智能在可持续口腔医疗保健中的应用。
J Dent. 2022 Dec;127:104344. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104344. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
5
Artificial intelligence and sexual reproductive health and rights: a technological leap towards achieving sustainable development goal target 3.7.人工智能与性健康和生殖健康及权利:朝着实现可持续发展目标3.7迈进的技术飞跃。
Reprod Health. 2024 Dec 23;21(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01924-9.
6
Integrating Catholic Social Teaching with AI Ethics to Address Inequity in AI Healthcare.将天主教社会教义与 AI 伦理相结合,以解决 AI 医疗保健中的不平等问题。
J Relig Health. 2024 Dec;63(6):4323-4341. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02140-2. Epub 2024 Sep 23.
7
Participation, equality, and justice in Rwanda for people who experience communication disability: Achieving Sustainable Development Goal 16.卢旺达为有沟通障碍者提供的参与、平等与正义:实现可持续发展目标16
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2023 Feb;25(1):136-140. doi: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2140828. Epub 2022 Nov 21.
8
Artificial Intelligence and Cancer Control: Toward Prioritizing Justice, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (JEDI) in Emerging Decision Support Technologies.人工智能与癌症防控:新兴决策支持技术中优先考虑公正、公平、多样性和包容性(JEDI)
Curr Oncol Rep. 2023 May;25(5):387-424. doi: 10.1007/s11912-023-01376-7. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
9
May Artificial Intelligence take health and sustainability on a honeymoon? Towards green technologies for multidimensional health and environmental justice.人工智能能否引领健康与可持续发展步入蜜月期?探索促进多维健康与环境正义的绿色技术。
Glob Bioeth. 2024 Mar 11;35(1):2322208. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2024.2322208. eCollection 2024.
10
Ethical, legal, and regulatory landscape of artificial intelligence in Australian healthcare and ethical integration in radiography: A narrative review.澳大利亚医疗保健领域人工智能的伦理、法律和监管环境以及放射学中的伦理整合:一项叙述性综述。
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2024 Dec;55(4):101733. doi: 10.1016/j.jmir.2024.101733. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Artificial intelligence in judicial adjudication: Semantic biasness classification and identification in legal judgement (SBCILJ).司法裁判中的人工智能:法律判决中的语义偏差分类与识别(SBCILJ)
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 26;10(9):e30184. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30184. eCollection 2024 May 15.
2
Trustworthy artificial intelligence and the European Union AI act: On the conflation of trustworthiness and acceptability of risk.可信人工智能与欧盟人工智能法案:论可信度与风险可接受性的 conflation(此处conflation可结合语境意译为“混淆”等,因无更多背景较难准确翻译,保留英文供进一步理解)
Regul Gov. 2024 Jan;18(1):3-32. doi: 10.1111/rego.12512. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
3
Challenges of artificial intelligence in medicine and dermatology.
人工智能在医学和皮肤病学领域面临的挑战。
Clin Dermatol. 2024 May-Jun;42(3):210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2023.12.013. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
4
Testing the safe-haven properties of gold and bitcoin in the backdrop of COVID-19: A wavelet quantile correlation approach.在新冠疫情背景下测试黄金和比特币的避险属性:一种小波分位数相关方法。
Financ Res Lett. 2022 Jun;47:102707. doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2022.102707. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
5
How financial development scale and R&D influence regional innovation efficiency: empirical evidence from the financial industry.金融发展规模和研发如何影响区域创新效率:来自金融业的实证证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 May;30(22):61257-61270. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16862-3. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
6
A method for estimating and removing streaking artifacts in quantitative susceptibility mapping.一种在定量磁化率成像中估计和去除条纹伪影的方法。
Neuroimage. 2015 Mar;108:111-22. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.043. Epub 2014 Dec 20.