Amin Fatima, König Christian, Zhang Jiajun, Kalinichenko Liubov S, Königsmann Svea, Brunsberg Vivian, Riemensperger Thomas D, Müller Christian P, Gerber Bertram
Department of Genetics of Learning and Memory, Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology (LIN), Magdeburg 39118, Germany.
Institute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Cologne 50923, Germany.
J Neurosci. 2025 Mar 12;45(11):e1498242024. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1498-24.2024.
For a proper representation of the causal structure of the world, it is adaptive to consider both evidence for and evidence against causality. To take punishment as an example, the causality of a stimulus is unlikely if there is a temporal gap before punishment is received, but causality is credible if the stimulus immediately precedes punishment. In contrast, causality can be ruled out if the punishment occurred first. At the behavioral level, this is reflected in the associative principle of timing-dependent valence reversal: aversive memories are formed when a stimulus occurs before the punishment, whereas memories of appetitive valence are formed when a stimulus is presented upon the relieving termination of punishment. We map the temporal profile of memories induced by optogenetic activation of the PPL1-01 neuron in the fly (of either sex) and find that compromising tyrosine hydroxylase function, either acutely by pharmacological methods or by cell-specific RNAi, extends and blunts this profile. Specifically, it (1) enhances learning with a time gap between the stimulus and PPL1-01 punishment (better trace conditioning), (2) impairs learning when the stimulus immediately precedes PPL1-01 punishment (worse delay conditioning), and (3) prevents learning about a stimulus presented after PPL1-01 punishment has ceased (worse relief conditioning). Under conditions of low dopamine, we furthermore observe a role for serotonin that is pronounced in trace conditioning, weaker in delay conditioning, and absent in relief conditioning. We discuss the psychiatric implications if related alterations in the temporal profile of reinforcement were to occur in humans.
为了恰当地呈现世界的因果结构,考虑支持和反对因果关系的证据是适应性的。以惩罚为例,如果在受到惩罚之前存在时间间隔,那么刺激的因果关系就不太可能成立,但如果刺激紧接着惩罚出现,因果关系就可信。相反,如果惩罚先发生,那么因果关系就可以排除。在行为层面,这体现在时间依赖价态反转的联想原则中:当刺激在惩罚之前出现时会形成厌恶记忆,而当刺激在惩罚解除时呈现时会形成奖赏性价态记忆。我们绘制了果蝇(无论雌雄)中PPL1 - 01神经元光遗传学激活所诱导记忆的时间特征,发现通过药理学方法急性地或通过细胞特异性RNAi损害酪氨酸羟化酶功能,会扩展并减弱这种特征。具体而言,它(1)增强了刺激与PPL1 - 01惩罚之间存在时间间隔时的学习(更好的痕迹条件反射),(2)当刺激紧接着PPL1 - 01惩罚出现时损害学习(更差的延迟条件反射),以及(3)阻止对PPL1 - 01惩罚停止后呈现的刺激的学习(更差的解除条件反射)。在多巴胺水平较低的情况下,我们还观察到血清素在痕迹条件反射中作用显著,在延迟条件反射中作用较弱,而在解除条件反射中不存在。我们讨论了如果人类强化的时间特征发生相关改变所具有的精神科意义。