Ryan Molly J, Lee Laurie A, Carnevale Franco A, Crump Laura, Garros Daniel, O'Hearn Katie, Curran Janet A, Fiest Kirsten M, Fontela Patricia, Moghadam Neda, Slumkoski Corey, Walls Martha, Foster Jennifer R
Dalhousie University, Department of Critical Care, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Department of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
J Pediatr Nurs. 2025 Jan-Feb;80:e228-e235. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2024.12.017. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
To better understand critically ill children's lived experiences with family presence in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).
This qualitative, interpretive phenomenological study is grounded in a Childhood Ethics ontology. We recruited children (aged 6-17 years) admitted to one of four participating Canadian PICUs between November 2021-July 2022 using maximum variation sampling. Data generation methods included participant observation and semi-structured interviews. Field-notes and interview transcripts were analyzed following the SAMMSA (Summary &Analysis coding, Micro themes, Meso themes, Syntheses, and Analysis) approach.
Fourteen participants (7 boys; 7 girls) described parental presence in PICU as essential. Parents contributed to their sense of safety, acted as advocates and interlocuters, and were crucial to participants' belief that their voices would be heard and their needs met. Participants valued the ways in which family and visitor presence mitigated the disruptions that being in PICU caused to their social worlds. Age limits restricted sibling and peer interaction and inadvertently restricting parental presence due to sibling childcare needs.
Parental figure presence in PICU is essential for children. Policies that focus on children as patients instead of whole people discredit childrens' concerns and the ways parental figures mitigate the disruptive nature of PICU admissions. Future policy generation must involve children to ensure that their priorities and concerns are meaningfully recognized.
为了更好地了解危重症儿童在儿科重症监护病房(PICU)中与家人陪伴相关的生活经历。
这项定性的解释现象学研究基于儿童伦理学本体论。我们于2021年11月至2022年7月期间,采用最大差异抽样法,从加拿大四个参与研究的儿科重症监护病房之一招募了6至17岁的儿童。数据生成方法包括参与观察和半结构化访谈。按照SAMMSA(总结与分析编码、微观主题、中观主题、综合和分析)方法对实地记录和访谈记录进行分析。
14名参与者(7名男孩;7名女孩)将父母在儿科重症监护病房的陪伴描述为至关重要。父母增强了他们的安全感,充当了倡导者和沟通者,对于参与者相信自己的声音会被听到、需求会得到满足至关重要。参与者重视家人和访客的陪伴减轻了在儿科重症监护病房对他们社交世界造成干扰的方式。年龄限制限制了兄弟姐妹和同龄人的互动,并且由于照顾兄弟姐妹的需求无意中限制了父母的陪伴。
父母在儿科重症监护病房的陪伴对儿童至关重要。将儿童仅视为患者而非完整个体的政策忽视了儿童的担忧以及父母减轻儿科重症监护病房入院带来的干扰性的方式。未来政策的制定必须让儿童参与,以确保他们的优先事项和担忧得到切实认可。