Daniels Colton L, Ellison Christopher G, Shattuck Eric C, Sunil Thankam S, Xu Xiaohe
Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, St. Mary's University, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Department of Sociology and Demography, The University of Texas at San Antoni, San Antonio, TX, USA.
J Relig Health. 2025 Jan 4. doi: 10.1007/s10943-024-02227-w.
The health implications of engaging in risk-taking or protective behaviors can have long-lasting effects on an individual's life. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in how religious attitudes and beliefs influence an individual's health behaviors. However, research on the role of the God Locus of Health Control (GLHC) in the religion-health literature is lacking. Data was derived from a national US sample (n = 1,259) via a cross-sectional survey exploring health attitudes and practices, and important sociocultural factors (e.g., religious beliefs). Results indicated that higher scores on the GLHC scale were associated with greater risk-taking behaviors that included having driven drunk, driving without a seatbelt, being a current tobacco user, and not using sunscreen. Higher GLHC scores were also associated with the protective behaviors of taking allergy medication and washing one's hands. These results indicated some variation by race/ethnicity, with African Americans and Hispanics/Latinos typically being more risk-averse. Further empirical theoretical implications are discussed.
采取冒险或保护性行为对健康的影响可能会对个人生活产生长期影响。近年来,人们越来越关注宗教态度和信仰如何影响个人的健康行为。然而,宗教与健康文献中关于健康控制的上帝 locus(GLHC)作用的研究却很缺乏。数据来自美国全国样本(n = 1259),通过横断面调查探索健康态度和行为,以及重要的社会文化因素(如宗教信仰)。结果表明,GLHC 量表得分越高,与更多的冒险行为相关,包括酒后驾车、不系安全带驾驶、目前吸烟以及不使用防晒霜。较高的 GLHC 得分也与服用过敏药物和洗手等保护行为相关。这些结果表明在种族/民族方面存在一些差异,非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔通常更倾向于规避风险。文中还讨论了进一步的实证理论意义。