• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国医院护士临床决策能力量表的开发。

Development of a Korean clinical decision-making ability scale for hospital nurses.

作者信息

Oh Sunyoung, Gu Minkyung, Sok Sohyune

机构信息

Department of Nursing, Graduate School, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Nursing, College of Health Science, Daejin University, Pocheon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 3;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02596-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02596-3
PMID:39754125
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11697459/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A hospital nurse's clinical decision-making ability is an important core competency that identifies and solves patient problems in nursing practice. This study aimed to develop a Korean clinical decision-making scale for hospital nurses, and verify its validity and reliability.

METHODS

A methodological design that develops a scale was used. A total of 71 Preliminary items on clinical decision-making of hospital nurses were selected using concept validity analysis of and expert opinion on 51 candidate items derived through literature review and qualitative interviews. We conducted a questionnaire survey with 371 nurses who in direct nursing and decision-making. The collected data were analyzed using exploratory factor analysis and confirmative factor analysis with SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 24.0 program.

RESULTS

Exploratory factor analysis was performed with principal axis factor analysis and Varimax rotation. Nine factors that accounted for 65.5% of the total variance were identified by deleting the items that not meet the condition that the commonality should be 0.30 or more and the factor loading over 0.50. The correlation coefficient between this scale and the Jenkins' clinical decision-making perception scale was r = 0.70 (p < 0.001), which determined concurrent validity. The internal consistency for the scale was Cronbach's α = 0.84, and this was developed with a total of 36 items.

CONCLUSION

A Korean clinical decision-making ability scale for hospital nurses was developed consisting of nine factors and 36 items with a five-point Likert. The Korean clinical decision-making ability scale for hospital nurses can measure clinical decision-making ability from various aspects that were not previously reflected.

摘要

背景

医院护士的临床决策能力是护理实践中识别和解决患者问题的一项重要核心能力。本研究旨在开发一套针对医院护士的韩国临床决策量表,并验证其有效性和可靠性。

方法

采用量表开发的方法学设计。通过对文献回顾和定性访谈得出的51个候选条目进行概念效度分析和专家意见,共选取了71个关于医院护士临床决策的初步条目。我们对371名从事直接护理和决策工作的护士进行了问卷调查。使用SPSS 23.0和AMOS 24.0程序对收集到的数据进行探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析。

结果

采用主轴因子分析和方差最大化旋转进行探索性因素分析。通过删除共性应达到0.30或更高且因子载荷超过0.50这一条件不满足的条目,确定了占总方差65.5%的九个因素。该量表与詹金斯临床决策感知量表的相关系数为r = 0.70(p < 0.001),确定了同时效度。该量表的内部一致性为Cronbach's α = 0.84,共由36个条目组成。

结论

开发了一套针对医院护士的韩国临床决策能力量表,由九个因素和36个采用五点李克特量表的条目组成。该韩国医院护士临床决策能力量表能够从以前未体现的各个方面测量临床决策能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6301/11697459/ce41cc1de537/12912_2024_2596_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6301/11697459/ce41cc1de537/12912_2024_2596_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6301/11697459/ce41cc1de537/12912_2024_2596_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development of a Korean clinical decision-making ability scale for hospital nurses.韩国医院护士临床决策能力量表的开发。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jan 3;24(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02596-3.
2
[Development and Validation of a Measurement to Assess Person-centered Critical Care Nursing].[一种以患者为中心的重症护理评估测量方法的开发与验证]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2018 Jun;48(3):323-334. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2018.48.3.323.
3
Testing the validity and reliability of the Korean nursing surveillance scale: a methodological study.检验韩国护理监测量表的有效性和可靠性:一项方法学研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 2;23(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02378-x.
4
Development and psychometric properties of the nursing ethical decision-making ability scale.护理伦理决策能力量表的编制及心理测量学特性
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Mar 14;26(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01190-9.
5
Emergency department triage decision-making by registered nurses: An instrument development study.急诊分诊决策:注册护士的工具开发研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4725-4735. doi: 10.1111/jan.16252. Epub 2024 Jun 2.
6
Developing an instrument to measure nurses' attitudes towards nursing students during clinical practice: A quantitative study.开发一种用于测量护士在临床实践中对护生态度的工具:一项定量研究。
Nurse Educ Today. 2025 Feb;145:106488. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106488. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
7
Development, reliability and validity of infectious disease specialist Nurse's Core competence scale.传染病专科护士核心能力量表的编制、信效度研究
BMC Nurs. 2021 Nov 17;20(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12912-021-00757-2.
8
Development and testing of the career decision-making self-efficacy scale for nursing students: a methodological study.护理专业学生职业决策自我效能量表的编制与测试:一项方法学研究。
BMC Nurs. 2022 Aug 23;21(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01017-7.
9
Development of an infection control competency scale for clinical nurses: an instrument design study.临床护士感染控制能力量表的开发:一项工具设计研究。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 19;23(1):250. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01904-1.
10
[Development and testing of a nurse turnover intention scale (NTIS)].[护士离职意愿量表(NTIS)的开发与测试]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Apr;43(2):256-66. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.2.256.

本文引用的文献

1
Nurse and Physician Perceptions and Decision Making During Interdisciplinary Communication: Factors That Influence Communication Channel Selection.护士和医师在跨学科交流中的感知和决策:影响沟通渠道选择的因素。
Comput Inform Nurs. 2024 Apr 1;42(4):267-276. doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000001108.
2
A Concept Analysis of Nurses' Clinical Decision Making: Implications for Korea.护士临床决策的概念分析:对韩国的启示
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 18;19(6):3596. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19063596.
3
[Structural Equation Modeling on Clinical Decision Making Ability of Nurses].
[护士临床决策能力的结构方程模型]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2019 Oct;49(5):601-612. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2019.49.5.601.
4
Benner's Framework and Clinical Decision-Making in the Critical Care Environment.本纳的框架与重症监护环境中的临床决策
Nurs Sci Q. 2017 Jan;30(1):52-57. doi: 10.1177/0894318416680536.
5
Nurses' and Physicians' Perceptions of Nurse-Physician Collaboration: A Systematic Review.护士与医生对医护协作的认知:一项系统综述
J Nurs Adm. 2017 Mar;47(3):165-171. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000460.
6
Understanding individual resilience in the workplace: the international collaboration of workforce resilience model.理解职场中的个人复原力:劳动力复原力模型的国际合作
Front Psychol. 2015 Feb 4;6:73. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00073. eCollection 2015.
7
Decision Making in Nursing Practice: A Concept Analysis.护理实践中的决策:概念分析
Nurs Forum. 2016 Jan-Mar;51(1):40-8. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12119. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
8
[A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity].[因子分析在结构效度评估中的应用指南]
J Korean Acad Nurs. 2013 Oct;43(5):587-94. doi: 10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587.
9
Thinking like a nurse: a research-based model of clinical judgment in nursing.像护士一样思考:基于研究的护理临床判断模型。
J Nurs Educ. 2006 Jun;45(6):204-11. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20060601-04.
10
Developing an instrument to measure and describe clinical decision making in different nursing fields.开发一种工具,用于测量和描述不同护理领域的临床决策。
J Prof Nurs. 2002 Mar-Apr;18(2):93-100. doi: 10.1053/jpnu.2002.32344.