Suppr超能文献

戈沙妥珠单抗作为广泛期小细胞肺癌患者二线治疗的2期开放标签研究:TROPiCS-03研究结果

Phase 2 Open-Label Study of Sacituzumab Govitecan as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC: Results From TROPiCS-03.

作者信息

Dowlati Afshin, Chiang Anne C, Cervantes Andrés, Babu Sunil, Hamilton Erika, Wong Shu Fen, Tazbirkova Andrea, Sullivan Ivana Gabriela, van Marcke Cédric, Italiano Antoine, Patel Jilpa, Mekan Sabeen, Wu Tia, Waqar Saiama N

机构信息

University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2025 Jun;20(6):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2024.12.028. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The phase 2 TROPiCS-03 study evaluated the efficacy/safety of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) as second-line treatment in patients with previously treated extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC).

METHODS

TROPiCS-03 (NCT03964727) is a multicohort, open-label, phase 2 basket study of solid tumors, including ES-SCLC. Adults with ES-SCLC that progressed after one previous line of platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (PD-[L]1) therapy received SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end point was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Key secondary end points included investigator-assessed duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS); blinded independent central review-assessed ORR, DOR, and PFS; overall survival (OS); and safety. Efficacy was evaluated in patients with platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive disease.

RESULTS

Among 43 patients (median follow-up, 12.3 [range, 8.1-20.1] mo), investigator-assessed ORR was 41.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 27.0%-57.9%), with 18 confirmed partial responses; median (95% CI) DOR, PFS, and OS were 4.73 (3.52-6.70), 4.40 (3.81-6.11), and 13.60 (6.57-14.78) months, respectively. The efficacy results of the blinded independent central review assessments were similar. The investigator-assessed ORR (95% CI) was 35.0% (15.4%-59.2%) in patients with platinum-resistant disease (n = 20) and 47.8% (26.8%-69.4%) in patients with platinum-sensitive disease (n = 23). Furthermore, 32 patients (74.4%) had grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). No TEAE led to SG discontinuation; one treatment-related TEAE (neutropenic sepsis) led to death.

CONCLUSIONS

SG has promising efficacy as second-line treatment of ES-SCLC, irrespective of platinum sensitivity. Safety was manageable and consistent with that observed in other SG studies.

摘要

引言

2期TROPiCS-03研究评估了戈沙妥珠单抗(SG)作为既往接受过治疗的广泛期小细胞肺癌(ES-SCLC)患者二线治疗的疗效/安全性。

方法

TROPiCS-03(NCT03964727)是一项多队列、开放标签的2期实体瘤篮式研究,包括ES-SCLC。既往接受过一线铂类化疗和抗程序性死亡-(配体)1(PD-[L]1)治疗后病情进展的ES-SCLC成人患者在21天周期的第1天和第8天接受10 mg/kg的SG治疗。主要终点是根据实体瘤疗效评价标准1.1版由研究者评估的客观缓解率(ORR)。关键次要终点包括研究者评估的缓解持续时间(DOR)和无进展生存期(PFS);盲态独立中央审查评估的ORR、DOR和PFS;总生存期(OS);以及安全性。在铂耐药和铂敏感疾病患者中评估疗效。

结果

在43例患者中(中位随访时间为12.3 [范围8.1 - 20.1]个月),研究者评估的ORR为41.9%(95%置信区间[CI]:27.0% - 57.9%),有18例确认的部分缓解;中位(95% CI)DOR、PFS和OS分别为4.73(3.52 - 6.70)、4.40(3.81 - 6.11)和13.60(6.57 - 14.78)个月。盲态独立中央审查评估的疗效结果相似。在铂耐药疾病患者(n = 20)中,研究者评估的ORR(95% CI)为35.0%(15.4% - 59.2%),在铂敏感疾病患者(n = 23)中为47.8%(26.8% - 69.4%)。此外,32例患者(74.4%)发生了≥3级治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)。没有TEAE导致SG停药;1例与治疗相关的TEAE(中性粒细胞减少性败血症)导致死亡。

结论

SG作为ES-SCLC的二线治疗具有有前景的疗效,无论铂敏感性如何。安全性可控,与其他SG研究中观察到的情况一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验