Suppr超能文献

抗体药物偶联物用于肺癌治疗的疗效和安全性:对随机和非随机临床试验的系统评价

Efficacy and Safety of Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Lung Cancer Therapy: A Systematic Review of Randomized and Non-Randomized Clinical Trials.

作者信息

Gallina Matteo, Carollo Anna, Gallina Anna, Cutaia Sofia, Rizzo Sergio, Provenzani Alessio

机构信息

Department of Biological, Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences and Technologies (STEBICEF), School of Specialization in Hospital Pharmacy, University of Palermo, Viale delle Scienze, Ed.16-17, 90128 Palermo, Italy.

Clinical Pharmacy Service, Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies (IRCCS ISMETT), Via Ernesto Tricomi, 5, 90127 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Pharmaceutics. 2025 May 3;17(5):608. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17050608.

Abstract

: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80-90% of all lung cancers. Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) represent an expanding targeted therapy option for the treatment of NSCLC. The aim is to perform a systematic literature review to evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of ADCs currently undergoing clinical trials for the treatment of NSCLC. : The study adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, ClinicalTrial.gov and Web of Science databases, covering the period from 2014 to 2024. Only randomized and non-randomized phase II-IV clinical trials focusing on ADC-based therapies for adult patients affected by NSCLC were selected. The Revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomized Trials (RoB 2.0) and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) were used to evaluate the overall risk of bias in the included randomized and non-randomized studies, respectively. While GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Efficacy endpoints were categorized based on primary outcomes while safety was assessed through the frequency and severity of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), and a qualitative summary of the findings was conducted. : A total of seven studies, including three randomized, three non-randomized, and one without specific allocation, were included, comprising 1287 patients, with 693 (54%) men, and an average age of 63 years old. Two studies were deemed to have a low risk of bias, while six had a moderate risk or some concerns. Five ADCs were evaluated: trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd), trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1), telisotuzumab vedotin, patritumab deruxtecan, and datopotamab deruxtecan (Dato-DXd). T-DXd demonstrated superior efficacy in HER2-overexpressing and HER2-mutant NSCLC, with an ORR of 52.9% and 49.0%, respectively. However, HER2-mutant patients exhibited a longer median DOR (16.8 vs. 6.2 months) but a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 TEAEs (38.6% vs. 22%). T-DM1 showed modest efficacy, with an ORR of 20% in HER2-overexpressing NSCLC and 6.7% in HER2-mutant patients. Dato-DXd demonstrated improved ORR (26.4% vs. 12.8%) and PFS (4.4 vs. 3.7 months) compared to docetaxel. Patritumab deruxtecan achieved an ORR of 39% in EGFR-mutant NSCLC, while telisotuzumab vedotin exhibited limited activity in c-MET-positive NSCLC (ORR 9%, median DOR 7.5 months). Frequency and severity of TEAEs varied across ADCs, with ILD being a major concern, highlighting the need for strict patient monitoring and early intervention to mitigate severe adverse events. : ADCs represent a promising advancement in NSCLC treatment, offering targeted therapeutic options beyond conventional chemotherapy and immunotherapy. T-DXd has emerged as the most effective ADC for HER2-mutant NSCLC with manageable safety profile, whereas Dato-DXd provides a viable alternative for TROP2-expressing tumors. While ADCs offer significant clinical benefits, careful patient selection and proactive management of adverse events remain crucial. Ongoing and future trials will further refine the role of ADCs in personalized NSCLC treatment, potentially expanding their tumor-agnostic use to broader patient populations.

摘要

肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺癌的80 - 90%。抗体药物偶联物(ADCs)是治疗NSCLC的一种不断扩展的靶向治疗选择。目的是进行一项系统的文献综述,以评估目前正在进行NSCLC治疗临床试验的ADCs的疗效和安全性概况。

该研究遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。在PubMed、ClinicalTrial.gov和科学网数据库中进行文献检索,涵盖2014年至2024年期间。仅选择针对受NSCLC影响的成年患者基于ADC的疗法的随机和非随机II - IV期临床试验。分别使用修订的随机试验Cochrane偏倚风险工具(RoB 2.0)和干预性非随机研究中的偏倚风险(ROBINS - I)来评估纳入的随机和非随机研究中的总体偏倚风险。同时使用GRADE(推荐分级、评估、制定和评价)方法来评估证据的确定性。疗效终点根据主要结局进行分类,而安全性通过治疗期间出现的不良事件(TEAEs)的频率和严重程度进行评估,并对结果进行定性总结。

总共纳入了七项研究,包括三项随机研究、三项非随机研究和一项无特定分配方式的研究,共1287例患者,其中693例(54%)为男性,平均年龄63岁。两项研究被认为偏倚风险低,而六项研究有中度风险或一些问题。评估了五种ADCs:曲妥珠单抗德鲁昔单抗(T - DXd)、曲妥珠单抗恩美曲妥珠单抗(T - DM1)、替雷利珠单抗维泊妥珠单抗、帕妥珠单抗德鲁昔单抗和达托泊单抗德鲁昔单抗(Dato - DXd)。T - DXd在HER2过表达和HER2突变的NSCLC中显示出卓越疗效,ORR分别为52.9%和49.0%。然而,HER2突变患者的中位缓解持续时间更长(16.8个月对6.2个月),但≥3级TEAEs的发生率更高(38.6%对22%)。T - DM1显示出适度疗效,在HER2过表达的NSCLC中ORR为20%,在HER2突变患者中为6.7%。与多西他赛相比,Dato - DXd显示出改善的ORR(26.4%对12.8%)和无进展生存期(4.4个月对3.7个月)。帕妥珠单抗德鲁昔单抗在EGFR突变的NSCLC中ORR达到39%,而替雷利珠单抗维泊妥珠单抗在c - MET阳性的NSCLC中活性有限(ORR 9%,中位缓解持续时间7.5个月)。不同ADCs的TEAEs频率和严重程度各不相同,间质性肺疾病是一个主要问题,这突出表明需要严格监测患者并进行早期干预以减轻严重不良事件。

ADCs是NSCLC治疗中一个有前景的进展,提供了超越传统化疗和免疫疗法的靶向治疗选择。T - DXd已成为HER2突变NSCLC最有效的ADC,安全性可控,而Dato - DXd为表达TROP2的肿瘤提供了一种可行的替代方案。虽然ADCs带来了显著的临床益处,但仔细的患者选择和积极管理不良事件仍然至关重要。正在进行的和未来的试验将进一步完善ADCs在个性化NSCLC治疗中的作用,可能将其与肿瘤无关的用途扩展到更广泛的患者群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b8cf/12114828/12e0365b2e8a/pharmaceutics-17-00608-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验