Suppr超能文献

面部空想性错视对猕猴面部选择性神经元的激活程度极低。

Face pareidolia minimally engages macaque face selective neurons.

作者信息

Koyano Kenji W, Taubert Jessica, Robison William, Waidmann Elena N, Leopold David A

机构信息

Section on Cognitive Neurophysiology and Imaging, Systems Neurodevelopment Laboratory, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.

Section on Neurocircuitry, National Institutes of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA; School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Prog Neurobiol. 2025 Feb;245:102709. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2024.102709. Epub 2025 Jan 2.

Abstract

The macaque cerebral cortex contains concentrations of neurons that prefer faces over inanimate objects. Although these so-called face patches are thought to be specialized for the analysis of facial signals, their exact tuning properties remain unclear. For example, what happens when an object by chance resembles a face? Everyday objects can sometimes, through the accidental positioning of their internal components, appear as faces. This phenomenon is known as face pareidolia. Behavioral experiments have suggested that macaques, like humans, perceive illusory faces in such objects. However, it is an open question whether such stimuli would naturally stimulate neurons residing in cortical face patches. To address this question, we recorded single unit activity from four fMRI-defined face-selective regions: the anterior medial (AM), anterior fundus (AF), prefrontal orbital (PO), and perirhinal cortex (PRh) face patches. We compared neural responses elicited by images of real macaque faces, pareidolia-evoking objects, and matched control objects. Contrary to expectations, we found no evidence of a general preference for pareidolia-evoking objects over control objects. Although a subset of neurons exhibited stronger responses to pareidolia-evoking objects, the population responses to both categories of objects were similar, and collectively much less than to real macaque faces. These results suggest that neural responses in the four regions we tested are principally concerned with the analysis of realistic facial characteristics, whereas the special attention afforded to face-like pareidolia stimuli is supported by activity elsewhere in the brain.

摘要

猕猴的大脑皮层中存在一些神经元集中区域,这些区域对人脸的偏好超过无生命物体。尽管这些所谓的面孔斑块被认为专门用于分析面部信号,但其确切的调谐特性仍不清楚。例如,当一个物体偶然看起来像一张脸时会发生什么?日常物体有时会由于其内部部件的偶然排列而看起来像脸。这种现象被称为空想性错视。行为实验表明,猕猴和人类一样,会在这类物体中感知到虚幻的面孔。然而,这样的刺激是否会自然地刺激位于皮层面孔斑块中的神经元,这仍是一个悬而未决的问题。为了解决这个问题,我们记录了四个功能磁共振成像(fMRI)定义的面孔选择性区域的单单元活动:前内侧(AM)、前底部(AF)、前额眶部(PO)和嗅周皮层(PRh)面孔斑块。我们比较了真实猕猴面孔图像、引发空想性错视的物体和匹配的对照物体所引发的神经反应。与预期相反,我们没有发现有证据表明神经元普遍更偏好引发空想性错视的物体而非对照物体。虽然有一部分神经元对引发空想性错视的物体表现出更强的反应,但对这两类物体的群体反应是相似的,并且总体上远低于对真实猕猴面孔的反应。这些结果表明,我们测试的这四个区域的神经反应主要与现实面部特征的分析有关,而对类似面孔的空想性错视刺激的特别关注是由大脑其他部位的活动支持的。

相似文献

5
Face Pareidolia in the Rhesus Monkey.恒河猴面部错觉。
Curr Biol. 2017 Aug 21;27(16):2505-2509.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.06.075. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
7
What does a "face cell" want?'.“脸细胞”想要什么?”。
Prog Neurobiol. 2020 Dec;195:101880. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2020.101880. Epub 2020 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
The neural code for "face cells" is not face-specific.“面孔细胞”的神经编码并非特异性面孔。
Sci Adv. 2023 Sep;9(35):eadg1736. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg1736. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
8
Specialized Networks for Social Cognition in the Primate Brain.灵长类动物大脑中社会认知的专门网络。
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2023 Jul 10;46:381-401. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-102522-121410.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验