Phillipson Lyn, Caiels James, Smith Louisa, Towers Ann-Marie
School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, NSW, Building 29, Northfields Ave, 2522.
Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 4;25(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05613-x.
Over the past decades, self-directed models of care have been implemented throughout the world to support older people, including those with dementia, to live at home. However, there is limited information about how self-directed home care is experienced by older people with cognitive impairment and dementia, and how their thinking informs their care choices and quality of life.
We used the ASCOT-Easy Read, a staggered reveal method, talk aloud techniques, probing questions, and physical assistance to support users of self-directed home care in Australia with cognitive impairment and dementia to discuss their Social Care Related Quality of Life (SCRQoL). Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically in NVivo. Demographic, functional, cognitive and SCRQoL scores were analysed in Excel and SPSS. Analysis of both the quantitative and qualitative data for each participant allowed us to examine consistency or discordance between ratings and participants' comments about their experiences within each domain.
Twenty six older people with cognitive impairment and/or dementia completed an interview. Ratings of SCRQoL were more favourable in lower order domains (e.g. food and drink, personal cleanliness, accommodation comfort and cleanliness and safety) than in the higher order domains (e.g. occupation and social participation). Overall SCRQOL also varied significantly from 0.40 to 0.97. Despite variable ratings, all participants described unmet needs associated with limitations in personal function and mobility, transport and the amount and flexibility of home care services they received. Qualitative comments suggest many experienced more significant limitations than some of their ratings may imply. This was attributed to adaptation and acceptance of limitations as a normal part of aging. The choice to remain living in one's own home was perceived as the most important outcome.
Some older people living at home with cognitive impairment and/or dementia adapt and accept their limitations as a normal part of the aging process. This affects expectations about their lives at home and their support. Rather than relying on self-direction, supports to live well at home could be enhanced by a greater emphasis on comprehensive needs assessment and more supports to promote reablement and enhance personal and community level participation.
在过去几十年里,世界各地都实施了自主护理模式,以支持老年人,包括患有痴呆症的老年人在家中生活。然而,关于认知障碍和痴呆症老年人如何体验自主居家护理,以及他们的想法如何影响其护理选择和生活质量的信息有限。
我们使用了ASCOT简易阅读法、交错揭示法、大声思考技巧、探究性问题以及身体协助,来支持澳大利亚患有认知障碍和痴呆症的自主居家护理使用者讨论他们的社会护理相关生活质量(SCRQoL)。访谈进行了录音、转录,并在NVivo中进行主题分析。人口统计学、功能、认知和SCRQoL分数在Excel和SPSS中进行分析。对每个参与者的定量和定性数据进行分析,使我们能够检查每个领域内评分与参与者对其经历的评论之间的一致性或不一致性。
26名患有认知障碍和/或痴呆症的老年人完成了访谈。SCRQoL在较低层次领域(如饮食、个人清洁、住宿舒适度、清洁度和安全性)的评分比在较高层次领域(如职业和社会参与)更有利。总体SCRQOL也有很大差异,从0.40到0.97不等。尽管评分各不相同,但所有参与者都描述了与个人功能和行动能力、交通以及他们所接受的居家护理服务的数量和灵活性方面的限制相关的未满足需求。定性评论表明,许多人经历的限制比他们的一些评分可能暗示的更为严重。这归因于将限制作为衰老正常部分的适应和接受。选择继续住在自己家中被视为最重要的结果。
一些患有认知障碍和/或痴呆症的居家老年人将他们的限制作为衰老过程的正常部分来适应和接受。这影响了他们对居家生活及其支持的期望。与其依赖自我导向,通过更加强调全面需求评估以及更多促进恢复能力和增强个人及社区层面参与的支持,可以加强居家良好生活的支持。