Suppr超能文献

了解认知障碍的居家老年护理服务使用者如何评价他们与社会护理相关的生活质量。

Understanding how users of home-based aged care services with cognitive impairment rate their social care related quality of life.

作者信息

Phillipson Lyn, Caiels James, Smith Louisa, Towers Ann-Marie

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia, NSW, Building 29, Northfields Ave, 2522.

Australian Centre for Health Engagement, Evidence and Values, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2025 Jan 4;25(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05613-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, self-directed models of care have been implemented throughout the world to support older people, including those with dementia, to live at home. However, there is limited information about how self-directed home care is experienced by older people with cognitive impairment and dementia, and how their thinking informs their care choices and quality of life.

METHODS

We used the ASCOT-Easy Read, a staggered reveal method, talk aloud techniques, probing questions, and physical assistance to support users of self-directed home care in Australia with cognitive impairment and dementia to discuss their Social Care Related Quality of Life (SCRQoL). Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed thematically in NVivo. Demographic, functional, cognitive and SCRQoL scores were analysed in Excel and SPSS. Analysis of both the quantitative and qualitative data for each participant allowed us to examine consistency or discordance between ratings and participants' comments about their experiences within each domain.

RESULTS

Twenty six older people with cognitive impairment and/or dementia completed an interview. Ratings of SCRQoL were more favourable in lower order domains (e.g. food and drink, personal cleanliness, accommodation comfort and cleanliness and safety) than in the higher order domains (e.g. occupation and social participation). Overall SCRQOL also varied significantly from 0.40 to 0.97. Despite variable ratings, all participants described unmet needs associated with limitations in personal function and mobility, transport and the amount and flexibility of home care services they received. Qualitative comments suggest many experienced more significant limitations than some of their ratings may imply. This was attributed to adaptation and acceptance of limitations as a normal part of aging. The choice to remain living in one's own home was perceived as the most important outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

Some older people living at home with cognitive impairment and/or dementia adapt and accept their limitations as a normal part of the aging process. This affects expectations about their lives at home and their support. Rather than relying on self-direction, supports to live well at home could be enhanced by a greater emphasis on comprehensive needs assessment and more supports to promote reablement and enhance personal and community level participation.

摘要

背景

在过去几十年里,世界各地都实施了自主护理模式,以支持老年人,包括患有痴呆症的老年人在家中生活。然而,关于认知障碍和痴呆症老年人如何体验自主居家护理,以及他们的想法如何影响其护理选择和生活质量的信息有限。

方法

我们使用了ASCOT简易阅读法、交错揭示法、大声思考技巧、探究性问题以及身体协助,来支持澳大利亚患有认知障碍和痴呆症的自主居家护理使用者讨论他们的社会护理相关生活质量(SCRQoL)。访谈进行了录音、转录,并在NVivo中进行主题分析。人口统计学、功能、认知和SCRQoL分数在Excel和SPSS中进行分析。对每个参与者的定量和定性数据进行分析,使我们能够检查每个领域内评分与参与者对其经历的评论之间的一致性或不一致性。

结果

26名患有认知障碍和/或痴呆症的老年人完成了访谈。SCRQoL在较低层次领域(如饮食、个人清洁、住宿舒适度、清洁度和安全性)的评分比在较高层次领域(如职业和社会参与)更有利。总体SCRQOL也有很大差异,从0.40到0.97不等。尽管评分各不相同,但所有参与者都描述了与个人功能和行动能力、交通以及他们所接受的居家护理服务的数量和灵活性方面的限制相关的未满足需求。定性评论表明,许多人经历的限制比他们的一些评分可能暗示的更为严重。这归因于将限制作为衰老正常部分的适应和接受。选择继续住在自己家中被视为最重要的结果。

结论

一些患有认知障碍和/或痴呆症的居家老年人将他们的限制作为衰老过程的正常部分来适应和接受。这影响了他们对居家生活及其支持的期望。与其依赖自我导向,通过更加强调全面需求评估以及更多促进恢复能力和增强个人及社区层面参与的支持,可以加强居家良好生活的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abf5/11700465/74bbc625d2ae/12877_2024_5613_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Outcomes of social care for adults: developing a preference-weighted measure.
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(16):1-166. doi: 10.3310/hta16160.
7
Social care-related quality of life of people with dementia and their carers in England.
Health Soc Care Community. 2022 Sep;30(5):e2406-e2418. doi: 10.1111/hsc.13681. Epub 2021 Dec 17.
8
Enhancing quality of life measurement: adapting the ASCOT easy read for older adults accessing social care.
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jan;34(1):189-200. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03791-0. Epub 2024 Sep 26.

本文引用的文献

2
Creating Dementia-Friendly Communities for Social Inclusion: A Scoping Review.
Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2021 May 12;7:23337214211013596. doi: 10.1177/23337214211013596. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
3
Consumer directed care aged care reforms in Australia since 2009: A retrospective policy analysis.
Health Policy. 2021 May;125(5):577-581. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.012. Epub 2021 Mar 25.
5
How do clients in Australia experience Consumer Directed Care?
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0838-8.
7
A comprehensive approach to reablement in dementia.
Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2017 Jul 27;3(3):450-458. doi: 10.1016/j.trci.2017.06.005. eCollection 2017 Sep.
8
Determinants of home-based formal help in community-dwelling older people in Finland.
Eur J Ageing. 2008 Oct 21;5(4):335-347. doi: 10.1007/s10433-008-0094-4. eCollection 2008 Dec.
9
Developing an Easy Read Version of the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT).
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):e36-e48. doi: 10.1111/jar.12294. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
10
Costs and economic consequences of a help-at-home scheme for older people in England.
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Mar;25(2):780-789. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12372. Epub 2016 Jul 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验