• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持有复杂需求的老年人参与家庭长期护理项目中结局评估。

Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long-term care at home programmes.

机构信息

School of Health and Society, Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities and Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

Australian Health Services Research Institute, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1453-1463. doi: 10.1111/hex.13484. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13484
PMID:35441484
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9327817/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is important to involve older people in evaluating public programmes that affect their lives. This includes those with physical and cognitive impairments (such as dementia) who may need support to live at home. Many countries have implemented new approaches to support older people to live well at home for longer. However, it can be challenging to involve disabled people in service evaluation, so we are unclear whether services are meeting their needs.

AIM

This study explored how a cascading methodology, offering different supports enabled the involvement of home care users with cognitive and physical impairments in the assessment of their care-related quality of life.

METHOD

We used multiple tools from the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) with n = 63 older adults who were recipients of home care in the Illawarra. We also offered different physical and cognitive supports as needed.

RESULTS

We started with the standard ASCOT questionnaire to assess the care-related quality of life, but then offered alternative formats (including Easy Read) and supports (including physical and cognitive assistance) if the older person needed them to participate. This allowed us to involve a greater diversity of older people in the evaluation, and changed what we found out about whether their care needs were being met.

CONCLUSION

There is a need to implement more flexible and inclusive methods to increase the involvement of vulnerable users of long-term care in the assessment of service outcomes. This is important to ensure that the perspectives of all service users inform the delivery of person-centred care. It is also critical to understand the extent to which programmes are meeting the needs of vulnerable service users.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Service users with dementia were involved in the design of the 'Easy Read' questionnaire used in the study.

摘要

背景

让老年人参与评估影响他们生活的公共计划非常重要。这包括那些有身体和认知障碍(如痴呆症)的人,他们可能需要支持才能在家中生活。许多国家已经实施了新的方法来支持老年人更长时间地在家中过上好日子。然而,让残疾人参与服务评估可能具有挑战性,因此我们不清楚服务是否满足他们的需求。

目的

本研究探讨了级联方法如何通过提供不同的支持,使患有认知和身体障碍的家庭护理用户能够参与评估他们的护理相关生活质量。

方法

我们使用了来自成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)的多种工具,共纳入了 63 名在伊拉瓦拉接受家庭护理的老年成年人。我们还根据需要提供了不同的身体和认知支持。

结果

我们首先使用标准的 ASCOT 问卷来评估护理相关的生活质量,但如果老年人需要参与,我们会提供替代格式(包括易读版)和支持。这使我们能够让更多样化的老年人参与评估,并改变了我们对他们的护理需求是否得到满足的发现。

结论

需要实施更加灵活和包容的方法,以增加长期护理弱势使用者在服务结果评估中的参与度。这对于确保所有服务使用者的观点都能为以患者为中心的护理提供信息至关重要。了解方案在多大程度上满足弱势服务使用者的需求也至关重要。

患者或公众贡献

痴呆症患者参与了研究中使用的“易读版”问卷的设计。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5310/9327817/7b27c0b0f4d0/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5310/9327817/4d5af6b04ec9/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5310/9327817/7b27c0b0f4d0/HEX-25--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5310/9327817/4d5af6b04ec9/HEX-25--g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5310/9327817/7b27c0b0f4d0/HEX-25--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Supporting the involvement of older adults with complex needs in evaluation of outcomes in long-term care at home programmes.支持有复杂需求的老年人参与家庭长期护理项目中结局评估。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1453-1463. doi: 10.1111/hex.13484. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
An evaluation of a specialist multiagency home support service for older people with dementia using qualitative methods.运用定性方法对一项针对老年痴呆症患者的多机构专科居家支持服务进行评估。
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;23(1):65-72. doi: 10.1002/gps.1841.
3
Factors associated with the amount of public home care received by elderly and intellectually disabled individuals in a large Norwegian municipality.挪威一个大市政当局中与老年人和智障人士接受的公共家庭护理量相关的因素。
Health Soc Care Community. 2016 May;24(3):297-308. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12209. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
4
Technology and the environment: supportive resource or barrier for people with developmental disabilities?技术与环境:对发育障碍者而言是支持性资源还是障碍?
Nurs Clin North Am. 2003 Jun;38(2):331-49. doi: 10.1016/s0029-6465(02)00053-1.
5
Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England.成人社会护理结果自填式工具包(ASCOT-SCT4)在英格兰患有长期身体、感官和心理健康问题的成年人中的效度及重测信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 18;15(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0.
6
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
7
Effective approaches to public involvement in care home research: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.公众参与养老院研究的有效方法:系统评价与叙述性综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jun 2;9(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00453-2.
8
Improving support and planning ahead for older people with learning disabilities and family carers: a mixed-methods study.改善对有学习障碍的老年人及其家庭照顾者的支持与提前规划:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jun;12(16):1-161. doi: 10.3310/MTHW2644.
9
TalkingMats as a decision aid to promote involvement in choice and decision-making around home care services for older people with mild to moderate dementia - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.使用对话垫作为决策辅助工具,以促进轻度至中度痴呆老年人对家庭护理服务的选择和决策参与 - 一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-03956-5.
10
Person-centered dementia care in home care services - highly recommended but still challenging to obtain: a qualitative interview study.居家护理服务中的以患者为中心的痴呆症照护 - 强烈推荐但仍难以实现:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 22;21(1):723. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06722-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The meaning of 'quality' of homecare for older people: a scoping review.老年人居家护理“质量”的含义:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 31;25(1):1009. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13057-1.
2
Enhancing Quality of Life: Key Factors from Long-Term Social Care Residents' Perspectives.提升生活质量:长期社会护理居民视角下的关键因素
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 6;22(2):231. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020231.
3
How do quantitative studies involving people with dementia report experiences of standardised data collection? A narrative synthesis of NIHR published studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Innovative methods for involving people with dementia and carers in the policymaking process.创新方法,让痴呆症患者和照护者参与决策过程。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):800-809. doi: 10.1111/hex.13213. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
2
Population-based preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit (ASCOT) for service users for Austria: Findings from a best-worst experiment.奥地利成年社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)服务使用者基于人群的偏好权重:最佳-最差实验的结果
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Apr;250:112792. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112792. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
3
How do clients in Australia experience Consumer Directed Care?
涉及痴呆症患者的定量研究如何报告标准化数据收集的经验?基于 NIHR 已发表研究的叙述性综合。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Feb 16;24(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02148-y.
4
How do older adults receiving aged care services understand and respond to the EQ-5D-5L? A think-aloud study in residential care.在养老院中使用出声思维法研究老年人如何理解和回应 EQ-5D-5L。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):3161-3170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-023-03466-2. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
澳大利亚的客户如何体验消费者导向型护理?
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jun 26;18(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0838-8.
4
Measuring outcomes of community aged care programs: challenges, opportunities and the Australian Community Outcomes Measurement ACCOM tool.测量社区老年护理计划的结果:挑战、机遇和澳大利亚社区成果测量 ACCOM 工具。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 May 29;16(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0918-7.
5
Recruitment of Individuals With Dementia and Their Carers for Social Research: Lessons Learned From Nine Studies.招募痴呆症患者及其护理人员参与社会研究:九项研究的经验教训
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2018 May 1;11(3):119-128. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20180308-01. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
6
Validity and test-retest reliability of the self-completion adult social care outcomes toolkit (ASCOT-SCT4) with adults with long-term physical, sensory and mental health conditions in England.成人社会护理结果自填式工具包(ASCOT-SCT4)在英格兰患有长期身体、感官和心理健康问题的成年人中的效度及重测信度。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Aug 18;15(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0739-0.
7
Developing a proxy version of the Adult social care outcome toolkit (ASCOT).开发成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT)的代理版本。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 19;15(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0682-0.
8
Measuring consumer outcomes: Development and testing of the Australian Community Care Outcomes Measure.衡量消费者结果:澳大利亚社区护理结果测量的开发与测试。
Australas J Ageing. 2017 Mar;36(1):69-71. doi: 10.1111/ajag.12377.
9
Older people receiving family-based support in the community: a survey of quality of life among users of 'Shared Lives' in England.在社区中接受家庭式支持的老年人:对英格兰“共享生活”服务使用者生活质量的一项调查。
Health Soc Care Community. 2017 Sep;25(5):1655-1666. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12422. Epub 2017 Jan 29.
10
Operationalising ethical challenges in dementia research-a systematic review of current evidence.应对痴呆症研究中的伦理挑战——当前证据的系统综述
Age Ageing. 2017 Jul 1;46(4):678-687. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw250.