Dodier N
Soc Sci Med. 1985;20(2):123-8. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(85)90296-5.
From interviews with 25 white-collar employees in France, the processes are analysed through which fellow workers and superiors morally evaluate persons who are ill. The differences between this lay interpretation and the medical one are highlighted along with the criteria (the 'sick leave' and 'morbidity' scales) used to form judgments. A person's illness can be used as a pretext to justify measures that are related to other aspects of his life at the workplace. These uses of illness lead us to raise new questions about the legitimation of symptoms by the physician. They also throw light upon the pervasive means of social control that lie outside medical institutions.
通过对法国25名白领员工的访谈,分析了同事和上级从道德层面评估患病员工的过程。着重探讨了这种外行解读与医学解读之间的差异,以及用于形成判断的标准(“病假”和“发病率”量表)。一个人的疾病可能被用作借口,以证明与他在工作场所生活的其他方面相关的措施是合理的。这些对疾病的利用促使我们对医生对症状的认定提出新的问题。它们还揭示了医疗机构之外普遍存在的社会控制手段。