Youssef Peter, Ciciriello Sabina, Tahir Talib, Leadbetter Joanna, Butcher Belinda, Calao Miriam, Walsh Nicole, O'Sullivan Catherine, Smith Tegan, Littlejohn Geoffrey
Institute for Musculoskeletal Health at University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Rheumatol Ther. 2025 Feb;12(1):173-202. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00736-4. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
This study sought to describe treatment patterns, persistence, and effectiveness of upadacitinib (UPA) alone and compared to other Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) or tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).
This retrospective, non-interventional study used the OPAL dataset, derived from electronic medical records. Patients initiated UPA (N = 2624), other JAKis (baricitinib and tofacitinib [N = 925]), or TNFis (adalimumab, etanercept, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab [N = 3540]) between May 2020 and March 2023. Median persistence (Kaplan-Meier) and effectiveness (Disease Activity Score 28-joint C-reactive protein, three variables [DAS28CRP{3}]) were evaluated for UPA-treated patients and in three propensity score-matched cohorts: UPA monotherapy versus combination therapy, UPA versus other JAKis, and UPA versus TNFis.
In patients prescribed UPA, 41.3% were ≥ 65 years old, 33.8% were prescribed as first-line advanced therapy, and 27.2% were prescribed monotherapy. Persistence on UPA was 26.6 months (95% confidence intervals: 24.4, 29.9) and longest in earlier lines of therapy. The DAS28CRP(3) remission rate was 73% at 3 months, with improvements observed across lines of therapy. UPA monotherapy and combination therapy had similar persistence (27.8 [23.5, 33.4] versus 30.4 months [22.1, 35.3], p = 0.84) and effectiveness. UPA showed longer persistence than other JAKis (28.8 [25.6, 32.4] versus 17.2 months [14.9, 19.8], p < 0.001) and TNFis (26.6 [24.9, 30.8] versus 13.3 months [11.5, 14.5], p < 0.001). DAS28CRP(3) remission rates were greater at 3 months for UPA than other JAKis (75.0% versus 61.5%) and TNFis (72.7% versus 59.5%). In unmatched subgroups, compared to cycling between TNFis, switching to UPA from other JAKis or TNFis resulted in longer persistence (JAKi-to-UPA: 25.3 [16.1, not reached]; TNFi-to-UPA: 27.8 [23.2, 35.4]; TNFi-to-TNFi: 9.6 [8.4, 10.7]) and greater DAS28CRP(3) remission rates over 9 months.
Overall, the breadth and depth of data from this large real-world dataset continue to support a favorable clinical profile of UPA for the treatment of RA and may inform treatment choices in everyday clinical practice.
本研究旨在描述类风湿关节炎(RA)患者单独使用乌帕替尼(UPA)的治疗模式、持续性及有效性,并与其他Janus激酶抑制剂(JAKis)或肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂(TNFis)进行比较。
这项回顾性、非干预性研究使用了源自电子病历的OPAL数据集。2020年5月至2023年3月期间,患者开始使用UPA(N = 2624)、其他JAKis(巴瑞替尼和托法替布 [N = 925])或TNFis(阿达木单抗、依那西普、赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、英夫利昔单抗 [N = 3540])。对接受UPA治疗的患者以及三个倾向评分匹配队列评估了中位持续性(Kaplan-Meier法)和有效性(28个关节C反应蛋白的疾病活动评分,三个变量 [DAS28CRP{3}]):UPA单药治疗与联合治疗、UPA与其他JAKis、UPA与TNFis。
在处方UPA的患者中,41.3%年龄≥65岁,33.8%被处方为一线进阶治疗,27.2%被处方为单药治疗。UPA的持续性为26.6个月(95%置信区间:24.4,29.9),且在早期治疗线中最长。3个月时DAS28CRP(3)缓解率为73%,各治疗线均有改善。UPA单药治疗和联合治疗具有相似的持续性(27.8 [23.5,33.4] 与30.4个月 [22.1,35.3],p = 0.84)和有效性。UPA的持续性比其他JAKis更长(28.8 [25.6,32.4] 与17.2个月 [14.9,19.8],p < 0.001),也比TNFis更长(26.6 [24.9,30.8] 与13.3个月 [11.5,14.5],p < 0.001)。3个月时UPA的DAS28CRP(3)缓解率高于其他JAKis(75.0% 对61.5%)和TNFis(72.7% 对59.5%)。在未匹配的亚组中,与在TNFis之间循环使用相比,从其他JAKis或TNFis转换为UPA导致更长的持续性(JAKi转换为UPA:25.3 [16.1,未达到];TNFi转换为UPA:27.8 [23.2,35.4];TNFi转换为TNFi:9.6 [8.4,10.7]),且在9个月内DAS28CRP(3)缓解率更高。
总体而言,这个大型真实世界数据集的数据广度和深度继续支持UPA在治疗RA方面具有良好的临床特征,并可能为日常临床实践中的治疗选择提供参考。