Suppr超能文献

现代新辅助治疗时代胰腺癌患者ypTNM分期的预后准确性

Prognostic Accuracy of ypTNM Stage in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer in the Era of Modern Neoadjuvant Therapy.

作者信息

Kim Hyeong Seok, Chae Hochang, Lim Soo Yeun, Jeong HyeJeong, Yoon So Jeong, Shin Sang Hyun, Han In Woong, Heo Jin Seok, Kim Hongbeom

机构信息

Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;32(4):2799-2808. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16792-7. Epub 2025 Jan 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging manual, which provided ypTNM for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), has not been comparatively assessed against pTNM for prognosis in pancreatic cancer. This study aimed to compare the prognosis between ypTNM and pTNM stages.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data from 586 patients who underwent pancreatic cancer surgery at a tertiary center between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed to compare survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages and identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The analysis included 541 patients (100 ypTNM, 441 pTNM). Significant differences in overall survival (OS) were observed among patients stratified by TNM stage (p < 0.001). However, no significant difference in OS was found between the ypTNM and pTNM groups (2-year survival rate (YSR): 76.8% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.094). Subgroup analysis by stage I (82.4% vs. 76.2%, p = 0.577) and II (68.8% vs. 61.6%, p = 0.715), and III (53.0% vs. 49.8%, p = 0.596) revealed similar survival rates. Multivariate analysis identified factors associated with OS: age > 65 years (HR 1.763, p < 0.001), CA19-9 > 150 U/mL (HR 1.439, p = 0.014), preoperative biliary drainage (HR 1.405, p = 0.029), pathologic T2 stage (HR 1.961, p = 0.004) and T3/4 stage (HR 2.830, p < 0.001) versus T0/1 stage, lymphovascular invasion (HR 2.220, p < 0.001), and adjuvant treatment (HR 0.251, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms comparable survival outcomes between ypTNM and pTNM stages in surgically resected pancreatic cancer, affirming the applicability of the TNM staging system after NAT. The results highlight the utility of TNM staging in guiding therapeutic decisions for patients undergoing NAT.

摘要

背景

美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)第8版TNM分期手册为接受新辅助治疗(NAT)的患者提供了ypTNM分期,但尚未针对胰腺癌预后与pTNM分期进行比较评估。本研究旨在比较ypTNM和pTNM分期的预后情况。

患者与方法

分析了2018年至2022年间在一家三级中心接受胰腺癌手术的586例患者的临床病理数据,以比较ypTNM和pTNM分期的生存结局并确定预后因素。

结果

分析纳入541例患者(100例ypTNM分期,441例pTNM分期)。按TNM分期分层的患者总体生存(OS)存在显著差异(p<0.001)。然而,ypTNM组和pTNM组之间的OS无显著差异(2年生存率(YSR):76.8%对66.7%,p=0.094)。I期(82.4%对76.2%,p=0.577)、II期(68.8%对61.6%,p=0.715)和III期(53.0%对49.8%,p=0.596)的亚组分析显示生存率相似。多因素分析确定了与OS相关的因素:年龄>65岁(HR 1.763,p<0.001)、糖类抗原19-9(CA19-9)>150 U/mL(HR 1.439,p=0.014)、术前胆道引流(HR 1.405,p=0.029)、病理T2期(HR 1.961,p=0.004)和T3/4期(HR 2.830,p<0.001)对比T0/1期、脉管侵犯(HR 2.220,p<0.001)以及辅助治疗(HR 0.251,p<0.001)。

结论

本研究证实了手术切除的胰腺癌中ypTNM和pTNM分期的生存结局具有可比性,肯定了NAT后TNM分期系统的适用性。结果突出了TNM分期在指导接受NAT患者治疗决策方面的实用性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验