Li Chuang, Xin Weini
Department of Stomatology, Clinic of Stomatology, Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Int J Dent Hyg. 2025 Aug;23(3):516-527. doi: 10.1111/idh.12899. Epub 2025 Jan 5.
The aim of this systematic review is to explore the effectiveness of different methods of reducing contamination and biofilms in dental unit waterlines (DUWLs) and to provide reference for future standardisation of disinfection practices in dental clinic.
This systematic review searched PubMed and Web of Science databases for DUWL disinfection studies from 2013 to 2023, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis, additional extracting relevant data based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
The study review identified 8442 articles, with 58 included after rigorous screening. Disinfection methods for DUWLs were categorised into 14 physical and 90 chemical methods. Peroxides, chloramine-based, and biguanide methods were frequently used, often in combination. The effectiveness of these methods varied; for instance, phenolic was effective, while alcohol was not, in reducing bacterial and biofilm contamination. Biguanide, when used alone or combined with chlorine-based or alcohol, showed mixed results. Chlorine-based methods, particularly when combined with quaternary ammonium salt or enzymes, were generally effective. Enzymes and iodophor also demonstrated efficacy, though with some inconsistencies. Mechanical systems, peroxides, quaternary ammonium salts, silver, and tube coatings had varying degrees of success. Other innovative methods, such as Aloe vera and slightly acidic electrolysed water, showed promise in some studies, but the effectiveness of flushing was questioned. This comprehensive analysis highlights the diversity and complexity of disinfection strategies for DUWLs.
Future studies should focus on how material composition and tubing design affect biofilm development and the effectiveness of disinfection methods to guide the design of advanced dental units.
本系统评价旨在探讨不同方法减少牙科设备水线(DUWLs)污染和生物膜的效果,为未来牙科诊所消毒实践的标准化提供参考。
本系统评价按照系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目指南及非Meta分析的综合方法,检索了PubMed和Web of Science数据库中2013年至2023年关于DUWL消毒的研究,并根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准额外提取相关数据。
该研究综述共识别出8442篇文章,经过严格筛选后纳入58篇。DUWLs的消毒方法分为14种物理方法和90种化学方法。过氧化物、氯胺类和双胍类方法使用频繁,且常联合使用。这些方法的效果各不相同;例如,酚类在减少细菌和生物膜污染方面有效,而酒精则无效。双胍类单独使用或与氯基或酒精联合使用时,结果不一。氯基方法,特别是与季铵盐或酶联合使用时,通常有效。酶和碘伏也显示出疗效,尽管存在一些不一致之处。机械系统、过氧化物、季铵盐、银和管道涂层取得了不同程度的成功。其他创新方法,如芦荟和微酸性电解水,在一些研究中显示出前景,但冲洗的有效性受到质疑。这一综合分析突出了DUWLs消毒策略的多样性和复杂性。
未来的研究应关注材料组成和管道设计如何影响生物膜的形成以及消毒方法的有效性,以指导先进牙科设备的设计。