Suppr超能文献

生长缓慢的肉鸡真的对动物福利更好吗?利用农场规模的经济模型揭示一个家禽福利问题。

Are slow-growing broiler chickens actually better for animal welfare? Shining light on a poultry welfare concern using a farm-scale economic model.

作者信息

Khire I, Ryba R

机构信息

Animal Ask, UK.

出版信息

Br Poult Sci. 2025 Jun;66(3):290-298. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2024.2432926. Epub 2025 Jan 6.

Abstract
  1. It remains unclear whether slow-growing broilers actually represent an overall animal welfare improvement - a major knowledge gap for policymakers and animal welfare NGOs. This paper addresses this knowledge gap by using an economic model to produce an all-things-considered estimate of the welfare effects of slow-growing genotypes. A quantitative end-point welfare metric that accounts for welfare challenges throughout the production cycle used the Pain-Track method from the Cumulative Pain Framework.2. Longer lifespans of slow-growing broilers (relative to fast-growing broilers) typically caused an increase in the time spent in low-intensity negative affective states. However, despite the additional broilers being farmed and their longer growth period, switching to slow-growing genotypes caused a decrease in higher-intensity negative affective states - a major win for welfare.3. These results can be used to alleviate consumer and producer concerns that any transition causes a welfare risk and provide an optimistic understanding of the overall welfare impact of transitioning to slow-growing broilers.
摘要
  1. 生长缓慢的肉鸡是否真的代表着动物福利的全面改善,目前尚不清楚——这是政策制定者和动物福利非政府组织面临的一个重大知识空白。本文通过使用一种经济模型,对生长缓慢基因型的福利影响进行全面评估,以填补这一知识空白。一种定量的终点福利指标,该指标考虑了整个生产周期中的福利挑战,采用了累积疼痛框架中的疼痛追踪方法。

  2. 生长缓慢的肉鸡(相对于生长快速的肉鸡)寿命更长,这通常导致处于低强度负面情绪状态的时间增加。然而,尽管养殖的肉鸡数量增加且生长周期更长,但改用生长缓慢的基因型导致高强度负面情绪状态减少——这对福利来说是一个重大胜利。

  3. 这些结果可用于缓解消费者和生产者对任何转型都会带来福利风险的担忧,并为向生长缓慢的肉鸡转型的总体福利影响提供乐观的理解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验