• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微型种植体支抗在治疗骨性II类错牙合畸形中的卓越效果。

Superior effect of mini-implant anchorage in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.

作者信息

Hong Vo Thi Thuy, Lien Tran Thi Kim, Tuan Pham Anh, Viet Hoang

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Hanoi, Vietnam.

Department of Odontology, Military Hospital 103, Hanoi, Vietnam.

出版信息

J Orthod Sci. 2024 Nov 25;13:44. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_35_24. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.4103/jos.jos_35_24
PMID:39758114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11698243/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of mini-implant (MI) anchorage versus conventional anchorage for the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was conducted on 64 patients with skeletal class II malocclusion. The patients were divided into two groups: 1) 32 patients underwent conventional anchorage, and 2) 32 patients underwent MI anchorage. Cephalometric radiographs were taken pre-treatment, and the data were compared with post-treatment measurements.

RESULTS

The age and gender distribution between the conventional and MI anchorage groups was similar, and the differences were statistically significant. The SNA and SNB angles post-treatment were reduced compared to pre-treatment measurements in both groups. The MI anchorage demonstrated a superior subsidence effect, reducing the level of forward displacement of the first molars in the maxilla. The MI group also exhibited less extrusion of the molars compared to the conventional group. In skeletal class II cases, especially in patients with a high mandibular angle using MI anchorage helped prevent the mandible from rotating counterclockwise, thus improving aesthetics rather than worsening them after treatment. In 75% of the cases in the MI anchorage group, the outcome was assessed as "greatly improved" based on the PAR index.

CONCLUSIONS

MI anchorage was more effective than conventional anchorage. It allows for greater posterior movement and intrusion of the maxillary incisors while maintaining or rotating the mandibular plane counterclockwise.

摘要

目的

评估微型种植体(MI)支抗与传统支抗治疗骨性II类错牙合畸形的有效性。

材料与方法

对64例骨性II类错牙合畸形患者进行研究。患者分为两组:1)32例患者采用传统支抗,2)32例患者采用MI支抗。治疗前拍摄头影测量X线片,并将数据与治疗后测量结果进行比较。

结果

传统支抗组和MI支抗组之间的年龄和性别分布相似,差异具有统计学意义。两组治疗后的SNA和SNB角均较治疗前测量值减小。MI支抗表现出更好的下沉效果,减少了上颌第一磨牙的前移水平。与传统组相比,MI组磨牙的伸长也更少。在骨性II类病例中,尤其是下颌角较大的患者,使用MI支抗有助于防止下颌逆时针旋转,从而改善美观而非治疗后使其恶化。在MI支抗组75%的病例中,根据PAR指数评估结果为“显著改善”。

结论

MI支抗比传统支抗更有效。它能使上颌切牙更大程度地向后移动和压低,同时保持下颌平面或使其逆时针旋转。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/f79f73b76ba9/JOS-13-44-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/0e96169628c5/JOS-13-44-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/4bec0a4034d3/JOS-13-44-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/147836b602cc/JOS-13-44-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/5c78af23cf39/JOS-13-44-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/982bd65f5f81/JOS-13-44-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/f79f73b76ba9/JOS-13-44-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/0e96169628c5/JOS-13-44-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/4bec0a4034d3/JOS-13-44-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/147836b602cc/JOS-13-44-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/5c78af23cf39/JOS-13-44-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/982bd65f5f81/JOS-13-44-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a2b2/11698243/f79f73b76ba9/JOS-13-44-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Superior effect of mini-implant anchorage in the treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion.微型种植体支抗在治疗骨性II类错牙合畸形中的卓越效果。
J Orthod Sci. 2024 Nov 25;13:44. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_35_24. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
3
[Efficacy of vertical control by using mini-implant anchorage in maxillary posterior buccal area for Angle class Ⅱ extraction patients].[微型种植体支抗在上颌后牙颊侧区域垂直控制对安氏Ⅱ类拔牙患者的疗效]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Apr 18;54(2):340-345. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.02.023.
4
Soft and hard tissue changes after compensatory treatment in skeletal class III malocclusion.骨性III类错牙合代偿性治疗后的软硬组织变化
PLoS One. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0322551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0322551. eCollection 2025.
5
Craniomaxillofacial Changes Using High-Pull J-Hook Headgear and Mini-Implant Anchorage in Adolescents: A Structural Superimposition Method.青少年使用高拉 J 钩头帽和迷你种植体支抗的颅颌面变化:一种结构重叠法。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Dec 1;45(6):433-440. doi: 10.17796/1053-4625-45.6.11.
6
Camouflage treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion with multiloop edgewise arch wire and modified Class III elastics by maxillary mini-implant anchorage.上颌骨微型种植体支抗的多曲方丝弓和改良型 III 类橡皮链矫治骨性 III 类错[牙合]的掩饰治疗。
Angle Orthod. 2013 Jul;83(4):630-40. doi: 10.2319/091312-730.1. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
7
[Soft and hard tissue changes after maxillary protraction with skeletal anchorage implant in treatment of Class III malocclusion].[使用骨支抗种植体上颌前牵引治疗Ⅲ类错牙合畸形后的软硬组织变化]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2012 Jun;30(3):278-82.
8
Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.上颌前突牙列治疗效果的三维牙科模型分析:头帽、微螺钉和微型钛板骨锚固的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017.
9
Preliminary three-dimensional analysis of tooth movement and arch dimension change of the maxillary dentition in Class II division 1 malocclusion treated with first premolar extraction: conventional anchorage vs. mini-implant anchorage.对拔除第一前磨牙治疗的安氏II类1分类错牙合患者上颌牙列牙齿移动和牙弓尺寸变化的初步三维分析:传统支抗与微型种植体支抗对比
Korean J Orthod. 2012 Dec;42(6):280-90. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.6.280. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
10
Mini-implant anchorage for en-masse retraction of maxillary anterior teeth: a clinical cephalometric study.微型种植体支抗用于上颌前牙整体后移:一项临床头影测量研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Dec;134(6):803-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.025.

引用本文的文献

1
Maxillary incisors and molars with conventional and skeletal anchorage device: A randomized controlled trial.采用传统和骨锚固装置的上颌切牙和磨牙:一项随机对照试验。
Bioinformation. 2025 Apr 30;21(4):669-674. doi: 10.6026/973206300210669. eCollection 2025.
2
Treatment of a severe class II subdivision malocclusion following failed bimaxillary anterior segment osteotomy: a case report.双颌前部节段性截骨术失败后严重安氏II类亚类错牙合畸形的治疗:一例报告
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 21;25(1):612. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06000-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Management of a severe skeletal open bite case using temporary anchorage devices and multiloop edgewise arch wire technique.使用临时支抗装置和多曲方丝弓技术治疗严重骨性开(牙合)病例
Clin Case Rep. 2024 Jun 7;12(6):e9023. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.9023. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Cephalometric measures correlate with polysomnography parameters in individuals with midface deficiency.头影测量与中面部发育不全患者的多导睡眠图参数相关。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 12;11(1):7949. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85935-7.
3
Efficacy and safety of micro-implant anchorage in Angle class II malocclusion orthodontic treatment: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.
微种植体支抗在安氏Ⅱ类错颌畸形正畸治疗中的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Dec 11;99(50):e23221. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023221.
4
Orthodontic Treatment and Healthcare Goals: Evaluation of Multibrackets Treatment Results Using PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating).正畸治疗与健康目标:使用PAR指数(同行评估评级)评估多托槽治疗结果
Healthcare (Basel). 2020 Nov 10;8(4):473. doi: 10.3390/healthcare8040473.
5
Comparison of the Accuracy of Manual and Digital Cephalometric Prediction Methods in Orthognathic Surgical Planning: A Pilot Study.正颌外科手术规划中手动与数字化头影测量预测方法准确性的比较:一项初步研究。
Turk J Orthod. 2018 Dec;31(4):133-138. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2018.17058. Epub 2018 Dec 1.
6
Comparison of Movement of the Upper Dentition According to Anchorage Method: Orthodontic Mini-Implant versus Conventional Anchorage Reinforcement in Class I Malocclusion.根据支抗方法比较上颌牙列的移动:正畸微型种植体与I类错牙合传统支抗增强的比较
ISRN Dent. 2011;2011:321206. doi: 10.5402/2011/321206. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
7
Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes.使用微螺钉支抗治疗安氏II类错牙合:与传统正畸力学治疗效果的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Mar;135(3):302-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.038.
8
Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.上颌前突牙列治疗效果的三维牙科模型分析:头帽、微螺钉和微型钛板骨锚固的比较
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):636-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017.
9
Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion.成人上颌牙牙槽骨前突患者使用骨锚固与口外锚固治疗效果的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Nov;134(5):615-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.12.022.
10
Mini-implant anchorage for a skeletal class II malocclusion with missing mandibular incisors: a case report.用于下颌切牙缺失的骨性II类错牙合畸形的微型种植体支抗:病例报告
World J Orthod. 2008 Summer;9(2):155-66.