Enengl Sabine, Rath Werner, Kehl Sven, Oppelt Peter, Mayr Andreas, Stroemer Annika, Eichinger Teresa, Lastinger Julia, Stelzl Patrick
Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Gynecological Endocrinology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, FAU, Erlangen, Germany.
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Nov 28;85(1):47-55. doi: 10.1055/a-2446-1828. eCollection 2025 Jan.
To evaluate the adherence of Austrian obstetricians to national guideline recommendations by investigating data on the current practice of tocolysis regarding indications, timing and monitoring of tocolysis, choice of tocolytics and serious side effects, maintenance tocolysis, support of decision-making and recommendations at patient's discharge from the hospital.
78 obstetric departments in Austria were invited to participate in a nationwide survey between June 5 and August 31 2023 by answering a web-based questionnaire about clinical standards. The survey was conducted approximately one year after implementation of the AWMF Guideline "Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth" 015‑025. Collected data were analyzed descriptively by performing measures of frequency. Fisher's exact test was used for group comparison.
The response rate was 69.2% (33.3% perinatal centers, 66.7% standard care). The most important indication of tocolysis were ≥ 4 contractions within 20 minutes of CTG tracing, as stated by 26 (48.1%) of the respondents; the AWMF Guideline 015‑025 (2022) was the most important decision-making support for tocolytic treatment (61.1%). 19 (35.2%) of obstetric units started tocolysis earliest at 23 + 0 weeks of gestation. Atosiban was the first-line tocolytic drug used by 43 (79.6%) of obstetric units, followed by nifedipine (n = 7, 13.0%); 49 of 54 obstetric units (90.7%) stated to perform maintenance tocolysis, among these 46 (93.9%) not routinely but on special indications (e.g. placenta previa). Serious side effects were observed by 77.8% of the respondents, mostly associated with the use of hexoprenaline.
Our survey revealed considerable discrepancies between evidence-based guideline recommendations and daily clinical practice in Austrian hospitals.
通过调查关于宫缩抑制剂使用的当前实践数据,包括宫缩抑制剂的适应症、使用时机和监测、宫缩抑制剂的选择和严重副作用、维持宫缩抑制剂治疗、决策支持以及患者出院时的建议等,来评估奥地利产科医生对国家指南建议的遵循情况。
2023年6月5日至8月31日期间,邀请奥地利的78个产科部门通过回答一份关于临床标准的网络问卷参与一项全国性调查。该调查在“AWMF早产预防与治疗指南”015 - 025实施约一年后进行。对收集的数据进行频率测量的描述性分析。采用Fisher精确检验进行组间比较。
回复率为69.2%(围产中心为33.3%,标准护理单位为66.7%)。26名(48.1%)受访者表示,宫缩抑制剂最重要的适应症是CTG监护下20分钟内有≥4次宫缩;AWMF指南015 - 025(2022年)是宫缩抑制剂治疗最重要的决策支持依据(61.1%)。19个(35.2%)产科单位最早在妊娠23⁺⁰周开始使用宫缩抑制剂。43个(79.6%)产科单位将阿托西班作为一线宫缩抑制剂药物,其次是硝苯地平(n = 7,13.0%);54个产科单位中有49个(90.7%)表示进行维持宫缩抑制剂治疗,其中46个(93.9%)并非常规进行,而是基于特殊适应症(如前置胎盘)。77.8%的受访者观察到严重副作用,大多与海索那林的使用有关。
我们的调查显示,奥地利医院基于证据的指南建议与日常临床实践之间存在相当大的差异。