Suppr超能文献

评估不同手术技术下股四头肌肌腱一期修复的失败率。

Evaluating Failure Rates of Primary Quadriceps Tendon Repairs Across Different Surgical Techniques.

作者信息

Katsma Mark S, Land Vaughn, Renfro S Hunter, Culp Hunter, Balazs George C

机构信息

Bone & Joint Sports Medicine Institute, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, USA.

Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jan 2;13(1):23259671241303924. doi: 10.1177/23259671241303924. eCollection 2025 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Quadriceps tendon ruptures occur infrequently in the general population. Biomechanical data suggest advantages with the use of suture anchor fixation for major tendon repair. Clinical studies of quadriceps tendon repair have been limited to small case series.

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical failure following primary quadriceps tendon repair with transosseous tunnel or suture anchor repair.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

The Military Health System Data Repository was queried to identify all adult patients who underwent primary quadriceps tendon repair in the Military Health System between 2014 and 2018. Patients were excluded if they had incomplete records, polytrauma, open injury, prior ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty did not undergo quadriceps tendon repair, or underwent revision repair. Follow-up was obtained by manual chart review of both orthopaedic and nonorthopaedic records, recording any evidence of ongoing knee issues. Univariate analysis was performed to determine associations between potential risk factors and repair failure. Multicollinearity was assessed between potential risk factors, and candidate variables were included in multivariate logistic regression models to determine independent risk factors for repair failure.

RESULTS

Following application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 245 knees in 234 patients were included. Mean age of the cohort was 52 years. Patients were predominantly male (223/234; 95%) and military retirees (143/234; 61%). Transosseous tunnel repair was the most frequently employed surgical technique (147/245; 60%), followed by suture anchor repair (78/245; 32%). Repair failure requiring revision surgery occurred in 11% of knees (27/245). Surgical-site infection following index surgery was associated with eventual rerupture ( = .02). There was no difference in failure rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair (12.2% vs 9.0%; = .51). Among knees undergoing suture anchor repair, no difference in failure was found between knot-tying and knotless suture anchor fixation ( = .73).

CONCLUSION

We observed no difference in failure of primary quadriceps tendon repair between transosseous tunnel and suture anchor repair types or between the 2 main suture anchor implant subtypes (knotless vs knot-tying anchors). A greater than previously reported rerupture rate was observed, indicating the need for continued investigation into optimal surgical techniques.

摘要

背景

股四头肌肌腱断裂在普通人群中并不常见。生物力学数据表明,在主要肌腱修复中使用缝合锚钉固定具有优势。股四头肌肌腱修复的临床研究仅限于小病例系列。

目的

评估经骨隧道或缝合锚钉修复进行初次股四头肌肌腱修复后的临床失败情况。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

查询军事医疗系统数据存储库,以识别2014年至2018年期间在军事医疗系统中接受初次股四头肌肌腱修复的所有成年患者。如果患者记录不完整、多发伤、开放性损伤、同侧先前全膝关节置换未进行股四头肌肌腱修复或接受翻修修复,则将其排除。通过人工查阅骨科和非骨科记录进行随访,记录任何正在进行的膝关节问题的证据。进行单因素分析以确定潜在风险因素与修复失败之间的关联。评估潜在风险因素之间的多重共线性,并将候选变量纳入多因素逻辑回归模型以确定修复失败的独立风险因素。

结果

应用纳入/排除标准后,纳入了234例患者的245个膝关节。队列的平均年龄为52岁。患者以男性为主(223/234;95%)且为军队退休人员(143/234;61%)。经骨隧道修复是最常用的手术技术(147/245;60%),其次是缝合锚钉修复(78/245;32%)。需要翻修手术的修复失败发生在11%的膝关节中(27/245)。初次手术后的手术部位感染与最终再次断裂相关(P = 0.02)。经骨隧道修复和缝合锚钉修复之间的失败率没有差异(12.2%对9.0%;P = 0.51)。在接受缝合锚钉修复的膝关节中,打结和免打结缝合锚钉固定之间在失败方面没有差异(P = 0.73)。

结论

我们观察到经骨隧道修复和缝合锚钉修复类型之间或两种主要缝合锚钉植入亚型(免打结与打结锚钉)之间在初次股四头肌肌腱修复失败方面没有差异。观察到的再次断裂率高于先前报道,表明需要继续研究最佳手术技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb73/11696997/47a00bf752a2/10.1177_23259671241303924-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验