Katsma Mark S, Land Vaughn, Renfro S Hunter, Culp Hunter, Balazs George C
Bone & Joint Sports Medicine Institute, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Virginia, U.S.A.
Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A.
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2024 Feb 14;6(2):100908. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100908. eCollection 2024 Apr.
To determine the rate of and risk factors for clinical failure and return to military duty following primary patellar tendon repair with either transosseous trunnel repair or suture anchor repair.
The Military Health System Data Repository (MDR) was queried to identify all adult patients undergoing surgical treatment of a patellar tendon rupture in the Military Health System from 2014 to 2018. Patients who underwent either transosseous tunnel repair or suture anchor repair were included. Health records were examined to collect additional data. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to determine independent risk factors for rerupture.
A total of 450 knees in 437 patients were included. Transosseous tunnel repair was the most frequently used technique (314/450, 77%), followed by suture anchor repair (113/450, 25%). Rerupture occurred in 33 knees (7%). There was no difference in rerupture rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair ( = .15), and this result persisted within the multivariate logistic regression model. Among transosseous tunnel repairs, use of low tensile strength suture was an independent risk factor for repair failure (odds ratio [OR], 3.4; = .016). Among suture anchor repairs, use of anchors 5.0 mm in diameter or greater (OR, 12.0; = .027) was an independent risk factor for repair failure.
There is no statistically significant difference in failure rate between transosseous tunnel repair and suture anchor repair in primary patellar tendon ruptures. However, the use of low tensile strength suture with transosseous tunnels and the use of suture anchors 5.0 mm in diameter or greater resulted in significantly higher failure rates. These data suggest that use of high tensile strength suture in transosseous tunnel repair and use of suture anchors less than 5.0 mm in diameter in suture anchor repair result in lower failure rate in primary patellar tendon repair.
Level III, retrospective cohort study.
确定采用经骨隧道修复或缝线锚钉修复进行原发性髌腱修复后临床失败及重返军事任务的发生率和危险因素。
查询军事卫生系统数据存储库(MDR),以识别2014年至2018年在军事卫生系统中接受髌腱断裂手术治疗的所有成年患者。纳入接受经骨隧道修复或缝线锚钉修复的患者。检查健康记录以收集额外数据。采用单因素分析和多因素逻辑回归模型确定再断裂的独立危险因素。
共纳入437例患者的450个膝关节。经骨隧道修复是最常用的技术(314/450,77%),其次是缝线锚钉修复(113/450,25%)。33个膝关节发生再断裂(7%)。经骨隧道修复和缝线锚钉修复的再断裂率无差异(P = 0.15),该结果在多因素逻辑回归模型中依然存在。在经骨隧道修复中,使用低抗拉强度缝线是修复失败的独立危险因素(比值比[OR],3.4;P = 0.016)。在缝线锚钉修复中,使用直径5.0 mm或更大的锚钉(OR,12.0;P = 0.027)是修复失败的独立危险因素。
原发性髌腱断裂经骨隧道修复和缝线锚钉修复的失败率无统计学显著差异。然而,经骨隧道使用低抗拉强度缝线以及使用直径5.0 mm或更大的缝线锚钉导致失败率显著更高。这些数据表明,经骨隧道修复中使用高抗拉强度缝线以及缝线锚钉修复中使用直径小于5.0 mm的缝线锚钉可降低原发性髌腱修复的失败率。
III级,回顾性队列研究。