Peters Bukola Usidame, McArthur Natalie, Titus Andrea
Department of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States.
NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 20;12:1501326. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1501326. eCollection 2024.
In this policy brief, we explore several potential drivers of heterogeneity in policy outcomes that can be examined in tobacco control policy evaluations, expanding the evidence base to contribute to continued, equitable progress in reducing tobacco-related health outcomes. We discuss these factors in the context of a hypothetical evaluation of the impact of smoke-free laws on current smoking and quit attempts in the Tobacco Nation. Despite a similar policy environment within the Tobacco Nation, there is variation in the strength of smoke-free law coverage across states. This commentary considers how policy design and other contextual factors, including co-occurring policies, and differential impacts across subgroups, may influence policy-attributable outcomes across time and space.
在本政策简报中,我们探讨了政策结果异质性的几个潜在驱动因素,这些因素可在烟草控制政策评估中进行考察,以扩大证据基础,为在减少烟草相关健康结果方面持续、公平地取得进展做出贡献。我们在对无烟法律对烟草之国当前吸烟情况和戒烟尝试的影响进行假设评估的背景下讨论这些因素。尽管烟草之国的政策环境相似,但各州无烟法律覆盖范围的力度存在差异。本评论考虑了政策设计和其他背景因素,包括同时实施的政策,以及不同亚组之间的差异影响,如何可能在不同时间和空间影响政策归因结果。