Kreisel Brian R, Scott Kelly M, Florkiewicz Erin M, Crowell Michael S, Morris Jamie B, McHenry Paige A, Benedict Timothy M
Baylor University-Keller Army Community Hospital Division 1 Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
Department of Rehabilitative Services Martin Army Community Hospital.
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2025 Jan 2;20(1):56-70. doi: 10.26603/001c.127137. eCollection 2025.
The United States military strives to prepare soldiers physically and mentally for war while preventing injury and attrition. Previous research has focused on physical injury risk factors but has not prospectively examined psychological risk factors.
This study's purpose was to investigate whether self-efficacy is a risk factor for musculoskeletal injury in an initial military training environment and compare it to other known risk factors.
Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.
Shortly after starting cadet basic training, new cadets rated self-efficacy by an 11-point questionnaire. Other risk factor data including injury history, sex, height, weight, body mass index, age, aerobic fitness, upper body muscular endurance, core muscular endurance and previous military experience were collected by self-report questionnaire and military fitness testing. The primary dependent variable was musculoskeletal injury that originated during the seven-week course. Independent variables were compared between participants who were and were not injured using Chi-squared test, t-tests, Cox regression analysis and time to injury was evaluated using Kaplan-Meyer survival analyses.
Seven hundred eighty-one (65.1%) new cadets were eligible and consented to participate. Injured cadets had significantly lower self-efficacy scores (p=0.003 and p=<0.001), shorter height (p=<0.001), lower weight (p=0.036), lower push-up and plank performance (p=<0.001), slower two-mile run performance (p=<0.001), and females sustained a proportionally higher number of injuries than males (p=<0.001). Cadets with low self-efficacy, shorter height, lower hand release push-up performance, lower plank performance and slower two-mile run performance were at greater risk for musculoskeletal injury. Cadets with less self-efficacy were also less likely to continue uninjured throughout cadet basic training according to a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (log rank test<0.002). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that only aerobic fitness predicted musculoskeletal injury (HR=1.005 [1.003-1.006], p=<0.001).
Participants with less self-efficacy sustained injuries earlier and more often than those with greater self-efficacy. However, aerobic fitness alone predicted future injury after controlling for all risk factors. Resolved prior injury was not a risk factor for future injury.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2B: Individual cohort study.
美国军方致力于让士兵在身心方面为战争做好准备,同时预防受伤和减员。以往的研究主要关注身体受伤的风险因素,但尚未对心理风险因素进行前瞻性研究。
本研究旨在调查在初始军事训练环境中,自我效能感是否为肌肉骨骼损伤的风险因素,并将其与其他已知风险因素进行比较。
前瞻性纵向队列研究。
在学员基础训练开始后不久,新学员通过一份11分的问卷对自我效能感进行评分。其他风险因素数据,包括受伤史、性别、身高、体重、体重指数、年龄、有氧适能、上身肌肉耐力、核心肌肉耐力和以往军事经历,通过自我报告问卷和军事体能测试收集。主要因变量是在为期七周的课程中发生的肌肉骨骼损伤。使用卡方检验、t检验、Cox回归分析比较受伤学员和未受伤学员之间的自变量,并使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估受伤时间。
781名(65.1%)新学员符合条件并同意参与。受伤学员的自我效能感得分显著更低(p = 0.003和p < 0.001),身高更矮(p < 0.001),体重更轻(p = 0.036),俯卧撑和平板支撑成绩更低(p < 0.001),两英里跑成绩更慢(p < 0.001),并且女性受伤的比例高于男性(p < 0.001)。自我效能感低、身高矮、手释放俯卧撑成绩低、平板支撑成绩低和两英里跑成绩慢的学员发生肌肉骨骼损伤的风险更高。根据Kaplan-Meier生存分析,自我效能感较低的学员在整个学员基础训练期间未受伤而继续训练的可能性也较小(对数秩检验< 0.002)。多变量Cox回归显示,只有有氧适能可预测肌肉骨骼损伤(HR = 1.005 [1.003 - 1.006],p < 0.001)。
自我效能感较低的参与者比自我效能感较高的参与者更早且更频繁地受伤。然而,在控制所有风险因素后,仅有氧适能可预测未来的损伤。既往已解决的损伤不是未来损伤的风险因素。
证据水平2B:个体队列研究。