Bej Taissa A, Wilson Brigid M, Akpoji Ukwen C, Mongilardi Nicole, Chengsupanimit Tayoot Todd, Song Sunah, Kowal Corinne, Stryczek Krysttel C, Hearns Rene, Honsberger Mark, Wilkerson Tai-Lyn, Firestone Christine, Subramaniam Soumya, Stevenson Lauren, Ball Sherry L, Jump Robin L P, Perez Federico
Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Northeast Ohio Healthcare System, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases & HIV Medicine in the Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2024 Dec 16;12(1):ofae725. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofae725. eCollection 2025 Jan.
Primary care providers (PCPs) may modify their antibiotic prescription practices if aware of their potentially damaging impact.
We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial at 12 Veterans Affairs community-based outpatient clinics. PCPs at clinics randomized to the intervention group received quarterly antibiotic use reports with feedback about antibiotics prescribed for acute respiratory infections and adverse event letters alerting about infection or antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacteria among their patients. The main outcome, antibiotic prescriptions in primary care visits, was compared in the preintervention (April-September 2020), intervention (October 2020 to September 2021), and postintervention periods (September 2021 to September 2022).
Among 52 PCPs at 6 clinics in the intervention group, 66% (33 of 52) and 54% (28 of 52) received ≥1 antibiotic use report and adverse event letter. In the intervention clinics, the proportion of primary care visits with antibiotic prescription during the preintervention, intervention, and postintervention periods was 1.4% (1088 of 77 697), 1.4% (2051 of 147 858), and 1.3% (1692 of 131 530). In the control clinics, this increased from 1.8% (1560 of 87 897) to 2.1% (3707 of 176 825) and 2.1% (3418 of 162 979), respectively, during the intervention and postintervention periods. The rate of visits with antibiotic prescription did not differ in the preintervention period (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.10 [.87-1.39); = .43) but did during the intervention (1.30 [1.04-1.62]; = .022) and postintervention periods (1.38 [1.09-1.74]; = .007). There were no differences in emergency department visits and hospitalizations.
PCPs from clinics assigned to a low-intensity intervention combining comparative feedback with adverse event notifications had lower antibiotic prescription rates.
如果初级保健提供者(PCP)意识到抗生素处方行为可能产生的有害影响,他们可能会改变这些行为。
我们在12家退伍军人事务部社区门诊诊所进行了一项整群随机对照试验。随机分配到干预组的诊所的初级保健提供者每季度收到抗生素使用报告,其中包含有关为急性呼吸道感染开具的抗生素的反馈,以及提醒他们注意患者中感染或耐抗生素革兰氏阴性菌的不良事件信件。主要结局指标是初级保健就诊时的抗生素处方情况,在干预前(2020年4月至9月)、干预期间(2020年10月至2021年9月)和干预后期间(2021年9月至2022年9月)进行比较。
在干预组6家诊所的52名初级保健提供者中,66%(52名中的33名)和54%(52名中的28名)收到了≥1份抗生素使用报告和不良事件信件。在干预诊所中,干预前、干预期间和干预后期间开具抗生素处方的初级保健就诊比例分别为1.4%(77697次就诊中的1088次)、1.4%(147858次就诊中的2051次)和1.3%(131530次就诊中的1692次)。在对照诊所中,干预期间和干预后期间这一比例分别从1.8%(87897次就诊中的1560次)增加到2.1%(176825次就诊中的3707次)和2.1%(162979次就诊中的3418次)。干预前开具抗生素处方的就诊率没有差异(优势比[95%置信区间],1.10[0.87 - 1.39];P = 0.43),但在干预期间(1.30[1.04 - 1.62];P = 0.022)和干预后期间(1.38[1.09 - 1.74];P = 0.007)有差异。急诊就诊和住院情况没有差异。
被分配到将比较反馈与不良事件通知相结合的低强度干预的诊所的初级保健提供者的抗生素处方率较低。