Kernif Tahar, Medrouh Bachir, Eddaikra Naouel, Oury Bruno, Holzmuller Philippe, Sereno Denis
Laboratory of Parasitic Eco-Epidemiology and Population Genetics, Pasteur Institute of Algeria, Dely-Brahim, Algiers, Algeria.
UMR INTERTRYP, IRD, CIRAD, University of Montpellier (I-MUSE), GoInsect: Infectiology and Entomology Research Group, Montpellier, France.
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 5;10(24):e40895. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40895. eCollection 2024 Dec 30.
Since the 20th century, numerous studies have detected or isolated parasites from the Trypanosomatidae family in various tick species. However, the status of ticks as vectors for medically or veterinary significant and remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to provide new insights into the potential vector status of these pathogens, which have significant medical and veterinary implications. We searched three databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science) from 1912 to June 30, 2023, resulting in 94 papers included in the qualitative analysis and 86 papers in the quantitative analysis. All identified field studies were conducted in endemic areas and investigated the presence of and parasites, DNA, or antigens in ticks. We recorded a pooled prevalence of Trypanosomatidae detection in ticks at 15.48 % [7.99-24.61 %], with significant variations depending on the year, detection method, and geographical area. Most of the infected tick species belonged to the genera , , , and . Experimental laboratory work on transmission routes demonstrated potential vector competence in both the Argasidae and Ixodidae tick families. Although our systematic review and meta-analysis provide compelling evidence of the natural infection of ticks by Trypanosomatidae parasites, along with some evidence of non-traditional transmission routes, they do not offer conclusive evidence regarding the role of ticks as biological or mechanical vectors for Trypanosomatidae species of veterinary and medical interest. This highlights the urgent need for additional investigations to address this point.
自20世纪以来,众多研究已在各种蜱虫物种中检测到或分离出锥虫科寄生虫。然而,蜱作为具有医学或兽医重要性的病原体传播媒介的地位仍不明确。我们进行了一项系统综述和荟萃分析,以深入了解这些具有重大医学和兽医意义的病原体的潜在传播媒介地位。我们检索了1912年至2023年6月30日的三个数据库(PubMed、谷歌学术和科学网),定性分析纳入了94篇论文,定量分析纳入了86篇论文。所有已识别的实地研究均在流行地区进行,调查了蜱虫中锥虫科寄生虫、DNA或抗原的存在情况。我们记录到蜱虫中锥虫科检测的合并患病率为15.48%[7.99 - 24.61%],患病率因年份、检测方法和地理区域而异。大多数受感染的蜱虫物种属于璃眼蜱属、硬蜱属、血蜱属和扇头蜱属。关于传播途径的实验室内研究表明,软蜱科和硬蜱科蜱虫都具有潜在的传播媒介能力。尽管我们的系统综述和荟萃分析提供了锥虫科寄生虫自然感染蜱虫的有力证据,以及一些非传统传播途径的证据,但它们并未提供关于蜱作为具有兽医和医学意义的锥虫科物种的生物或机械传播媒介作用的确凿证据。这凸显了迫切需要进行更多调查来解决这一问题。