• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科罗拉多心力衰竭急性风险模型:一种针对心脏移植等待名单上患者的死亡率模型。

The Colorado Heart Failure Acuity Risk Model: A Mortality Model for Waitlisted Cardiac Transplant Patients.

作者信息

Murphy Rachel D, Park Sarah Y, Allen Larry A, Ambardekar Amrut V, Cleveland Joseph C, Cain Michael T, Kaplan Bruce, Hoffman Jordan R H, Malamon John S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

JACC Adv. 2024 Dec 13;4(1):101449. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101449. eCollection 2025 Jan.

DOI:10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101449
PMID:39759431
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11699630/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is no mathematical model used nationally to determine the medical urgency of patients on the heart transplant waitlist in the United States. While the current organ distribution system accounts for many patient factors, a truly objective model is needed to more reliably stratify patients by their medical acuity.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to develop risk scores (Colorado Heart failure Acuity Risk Model [CHARM] score) to predict mortality in adults waitlisted for heart transplant.

METHODS

Risk scores were based on multivariable logistic regression models with mortality endpoints at 90 days, 180 days, 1 year, and 2 years. The models included serology data and patient history variables from waitlisted patients (N = 4,176) within the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database from January 1, 2017, to September 2, 2023.

RESULTS

The CHARM score included serum markers (brain natriuretic peptide, creatinine, sodium, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, total bilirubin) and clinical variables (history of cardiac surgery, prior transplant, willingness to accept an hepatitis C virus positive heart, use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, use of mechanical life support, implantation of a cardiac defibrillator, and ventilator support prior to transplant). Sample holdout-validation for the models yielded average area under the curves of 0.825 (90-day), 0.805 (180-day), 0.779 (1-year), and 0.766 (2-year). Risk indices for all models were 99% correlated with observed mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHARM score provides reliable calibration and prediction, offering an objective system for identifying critically ill patients on the heart transplant waitlist. The CHARM score will be useful in the era of continuous distribution to standardize organ allocation.

摘要

背景

目前,美国尚无全国性的数学模型用于确定心脏移植等候名单上患者的医疗紧急程度。虽然当前的器官分配系统考虑了许多患者因素,但仍需要一个真正客观的模型来更可靠地根据患者的医疗敏锐度对其进行分层。

目的

本研究的目的是开发风险评分(科罗拉多心力衰竭敏锐度风险模型[CHARM]评分),以预测等待心脏移植的成年人的死亡率。

方法

风险评分基于多变量逻辑回归模型,其死亡率终点分别为90天、180天、1年和2年。这些模型纳入了2017年1月1日至2023年9月2日移植受者科学登记数据库中等待名单上患者(N = 4176)的血清学数据和患者病史变量。

结果

CHARM评分包括血清标志物(脑钠肽、肌酐、钠、天冬氨酸转氨酶、白蛋白、总胆红素)和临床变量(心脏手术史、既往移植史、接受丙型肝炎病毒阳性心脏的意愿、体外膜肺氧合的使用、机械生命支持的使用、心脏除颤器的植入以及移植前的呼吸机支持)。模型的样本保留验证得出曲线下平均面积分别为0.825(90天)、0.805(180天)、0.779(1年)和0.766(2年)。所有模型的风险指数与观察到的死亡率的相关性均为99%。

结论

CHARM评分提供了可靠的校准和预测,为识别心脏移植等候名单上的重症患者提供了一个客观系统。在持续分配的时代,CHARM评分将有助于规范器官分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/ed17cd127db9/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/365c44346bb6/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/365c44346bb6/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/1e3158189647/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/12283e0e1db2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/5e8862ff9047/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/ed17cd127db9/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/365c44346bb6/ga1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/365c44346bb6/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/1e3158189647/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/12283e0e1db2/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/5e8862ff9047/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02dd/11699630/ed17cd127db9/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
The Colorado Heart Failure Acuity Risk Model: A Mortality Model for Waitlisted Cardiac Transplant Patients.科罗拉多心力衰竭急性风险模型:一种针对心脏移植等待名单上患者的死亡率模型。
JACC Adv. 2024 Dec 13;4(1):101449. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101449. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Variables of importance in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database predictive of heart transplant waitlist mortality.在 Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients 数据库中,对心脏移植候补者死亡率有预测意义的重要变量。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2067-2076. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15265. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
3
Three-year outcomes after bridge to transplantation ECMO-pre- and post-2018 UNOS revised heart allocation system.桥接移植 ECMO 后三年的结果:2018 年 UNOS 修订心脏分配系统前后。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2024 Nov;43(11):1838-1845. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.07.025. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
4
Prediction of Waitlist Mortality in Adult Heart Transplant Candidates: The Candidate Risk Score.成人心脏移植候选者等待名单死亡率的预测:候选者风险评分
Transplantation. 2017 Sep;101(9):2175-2182. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001724.
5
Development and Validation of a Risk Score Predicting Death Without Transplant in Adult Heart Transplant Candidates.成人心脏移植候选者死亡而无需移植的风险评分的制定和验证。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 13;331(6):500-509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27029.
6
Impact of ventricular assist device use on pediatric heart transplant waitlist mortality: Analysis of the scientific registry of transplant recipients database.心室辅助装置使用对儿科心脏移植候补者死亡率的影响:对移植受者数据库科学登记处的分析。
Pediatr Transplant. 2024 Jun;28(4):e14787. doi: 10.1111/petr.14787.
7
Pediatric risk to orthotopic heart transplant (PRO) score: Insights from United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) waitlist mortality findings.儿科风险与原位心脏移植(PRO)评分:来自器官共享联合网络(UNOS)候补者死亡率发现的见解。
Pediatr Transplant. 2023 Sep;27(6):e14525. doi: 10.1111/petr.14525. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
8
Analysis of the revised heart allocation policy and the influence of increased mechanical circulatory support on survival.分析修订后的心脏分配政策和机械循环支持增加对生存率的影响。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Jun;165(6):2090-2103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.11.076. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
9
Revised Heart Allocation Policy Improved Waitlist Mortality and Waiting Time With Maintained Outcomes in En-Bloc Heart-Lung Transplant Candidates and Recipients.修订后的心脏分配政策改善了整块心肺移植候选人和受者的候补死亡率和等待时间,同时保持了结果。
Transpl Int. 2023 Dec 13;36:11956. doi: 10.3389/ti.2023.11956. eCollection 2023.
10
Improved survival after heart transplantation in patients bridged with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the new allocation system.新分配系统中体外膜肺氧合桥接的心脏移植患者的生存率提高。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021 Feb;40(2):149-157. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2020.11.004. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of a Risk Score Predicting Death Without Transplant in Adult Heart Transplant Candidates.成人心脏移植候选者死亡而无需移植的风险评分的制定和验证。
JAMA. 2024 Feb 13;331(6):500-509. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.27029.
2
Patient years lost due to cytomegalovirus serostatus mismatching in the scientific registry of transplant recipients.因巨细胞病毒血清学错配导致的移植受者科学注册处患者损失年数。
Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 9;14:1292648. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1292648. eCollection 2023.
3
The Accuracy of Initial U.S. Heart Transplant Candidate Rankings.
美国心脏移植候选者初始排名的准确性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 May;11(5):504-512. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Apr 12.
4
Impact of the 2018 UNOS Heart Transplant Policy Changes on Patient Outcomes.2018 年 UNOS 心脏移植政策变化对患者结局的影响。
JACC Heart Fail. 2023 May;11(5):491-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
5
OPTN/SRTR 2020 Annual Data Report: Heart.OPTN/SRTR 2020 年度数据报告:心脏。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Mar;22 Suppl 2:350-437. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16977.
6
An updated estimate of posttransplant survival after implementation of the new donor heart allocation policy.新的供体心脏分配政策实施后移植后生存率的最新估计。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jun;22(6):1683-1690. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16931. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
7
The natriuretic peptide system in heart failure: Diagnostic and therapeutic implications.心力衰竭中心钠肽系统:诊断和治疗意义。
Pharmacol Ther. 2021 Nov;227:107863. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107863. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
8
Predictors of Survival After Liver Transplantation in Patients With the Highest Acuity (MELD ≥40).最高紧急程度(MELD≥40)患者肝移植后的生存率预测因素。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):458-466. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004211.
9
Outcomes of the First 1300 Adult Heart Transplants in the United States After the Allocation Policy Change.美国分配政策改变后首批1300例成人心脏移植的结果。
Circulation. 2020 May 19;141(20):1662-1664. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.045354. Epub 2020 May 18.
10
An early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United States.美国2018年新型供体心脏分配系统的早期结果调查。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020 Jan;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2019.11.002. Epub 2019 Nov 20.