Ang Song Peng, Rajendran Jackson, Ee Chia Jia, Singh Pratiksha, Iglesias Jose
Department of Internal Medicine, Rutgers Health/Community Medical Center, Toms River, NJ, USA.
Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Science Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
J Clin Med Res. 2024 Dec;16(12):589-599. doi: 10.14740/jocmr6101. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) is a critical indicator of cardiovascular risk, particularly in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Traditional classification systems may underestimate the risk in those with moderate CKD. This study aimed to evaluate the association between CKD risk categories - defined by both estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and albuminuria - and the prevalence of severe AAC.
This cross-sectional study analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014. We included adults aged ≥ 40 years who underwent imaging for AAC assessment, excluding pregnant individuals and those without AAC scores. Survey-weighted and multivariate logistic regression was employed to assess the relationship between CKD risk categories and severe AAC, adjusting for age, hypertension, and smoking history. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore variability across demographic and clinical subgroups.
We analyzed data from 3,140 participants in the NHANES, 423 (13.4%) of whom had severe AAC. The cohort was categorized into CKD risk categories 1 through 4, with the majority (76%) in stage 1. Severe AAC was more prevalent among older individuals and those with traditional cardiovascular risk factors. Initial unadjusted analyses revealed that CKD category 2 was associated with a nearly fourfold increase in severe AAC (odds ratio (OR): 3.93), while categories 3 and 4 showed 3.75-fold and over 10-fold increases, respectively (all P < 0.01). However, after adjusting for confounders, categories 2 and 4 showed higher risks of severe AAC compared to category 1, but these associations did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90 - 1.86, P = 0.06 and OR: 5.70, 95% CI: 0.85 - 38.00, P = 0.07, respectively).
Our study offers insights that may complement the current reliance on eGFR and albuminuria in risk stratification, highlighting that CKD category 2, defined by mildly reduced eGFR and albuminuria, may be a potential marker for severe AAC. Although statistical significance was narrowly missed after full adjustment, the clinical implications remain significant, advocating for more aggressive cardiovascular risk management in this population. This understanding may contribute to evolving approaches in CKD-related cardiovascular risk assessment and inform potential intervention strategies.
腹主动脉钙化(AAC)是心血管风险的关键指标,尤其在慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者中。传统分类系统可能低估中度CKD患者的风险。本研究旨在评估由估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和蛋白尿定义的CKD风险类别与重度AAC患病率之间的关联。
这项横断面研究分析了2013 - 2014年美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)的数据。我们纳入了年龄≥40岁且接受了AAC评估成像的成年人,排除了孕妇和没有AAC评分的个体。采用调查加权和多变量逻辑回归来评估CKD风险类别与重度AAC之间的关系,并对年龄、高血压和吸烟史进行了调整。进行亚组分析以探索不同人口统计学和临床亚组之间的差异。
我们分析了NHANES中3140名参与者的数据,其中423人(13.4%)患有重度AAC。该队列被分为CKD风险类别1至4,大多数(76%)处于1期。重度AAC在老年人和有传统心血管危险因素的人群中更为普遍。最初的未调整分析显示,CKD类别2与重度AAC增加近四倍相关(比值比(OR):3.93),而类别3和4分别显示增加3.75倍和超过10倍(所有P < 0.01)。然而,在调整混杂因素后,与类别1相比,类别2和4显示出更高的重度AAC风险,但这些关联未达到统计学显著性(OR:1.72,95%置信区间(CI):0.90 - 1.86,P = 0.06;OR:5.70,95% CI:0.85 - 38.00,P = 0.07)。
我们的研究提供了一些见解,可能补充当前在风险分层中对eGFR和蛋白尿的依赖,强调由轻度降低的eGFR和蛋白尿定义的CKD类别2可能是重度AAC的潜在标志物。尽管在全面调整后勉强未达到统计学显著性,但临床意义仍然重大,主张对该人群进行更积极的心血管风险管理。这种认识可能有助于改进CKD相关心血管风险评估方法,并为潜在的干预策略提供信息。