Kim Min Ji, Lee Jun Suk, Mok Jung Ho, Lim Hyoseob, Hahn Hyung Min, Lee Il Jae
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Int Wound J. 2024 Feb;21(2):e14679. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14679.
Management of pressure sores can have various environmental effects; moreover, the COVID-19 pandemic notably affected efforts towards effective management of pressure sores. Some cases of COVID-19 infections require long-term hospitalization in the intensive care unit. Moreover, special protective equipment worn by physicians owing to the pandemic complicate wound management. In this study, we compared the pressure ulcer characteristics between isolated patients with and those without COVID-19 and evaluated the effects of isolation on pressure sores. From November 2022 to February 2023, patients who had pressure sores were included and their medical records were reviewed retrospectively. The experimental group included patients with confirmed COVID-19 infections, who received clinical treatment in an isolated unit. Wound characteristics in each group and associated risk factors were analysed. Fifty-four isolated patients with COVID-19 and 58 control patients were included. The Braden Scale score and Korea patient classification system-1 did not vary significantly between the two groups. However, the number of Grade I pressure sores in the COVID-19 isolation group was significantly lower than those in the control group (p < 0.001), while the number of lesions was significantly higher (p = 0.034). The mortality rate in the COVID-19 isolation group was higher than that in the control group (p = 0.008), and more patients were discharged with unhealed wounds (p = 0.004). A higher treatment effect on pressure sores may be expected if the disease is more actively managed. Moreover, the wound care systems for isolated patients with COVID-19 require further attention.
压疮的管理会产生多种环境影响;此外,新冠疫情显著影响了压疮有效管理的工作。一些新冠感染病例需要在重症监护病房长期住院。此外,由于疫情医生佩戴的特殊防护设备使伤口管理变得复杂。在本研究中,我们比较了感染新冠与未感染新冠的隔离患者之间的压疮特征,并评估了隔离对压疮的影响。2022年11月至2023年2月,纳入患有压疮的患者,并对其病历进行回顾性审查。实验组包括确诊感染新冠的患者,他们在隔离病房接受临床治疗。分析了每组的伤口特征及相关危险因素。纳入了54例感染新冠的隔离患者和58例对照患者。两组之间的Braden量表评分和韩国患者分类系统-1没有显著差异。然而,新冠隔离组中I级压疮的数量显著低于对照组(p < 0.001),而病变数量显著更高(p = 0.034)。新冠隔离组的死亡率高于对照组(p = 0.008),更多患者出院时伤口未愈合(p = 0.004)。如果对该疾病进行更积极的管理,可能会对压疮产生更高的治疗效果。此外,感染新冠的隔离患者的伤口护理系统需要进一步关注。