Bejaoui Ines, Maatouk Mohamed, Kbir Ghassen Hamdi, Karoui Yasser, Essid Nada, Ben Moussa Mounir
A21 Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Charles Nicolle Hospital, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025 Jan;35(1):55-64. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0053. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
The traditional method of performing open common bile duct exploration (OCBDE) was replaced by a less invasive procedure known as laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) in elective surgery. But at present, the application of this technique is considered novel and controversial to treat acute cholangitis (AC). The aim of our systematic review was to investigate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic surgery in patients with AC. Studies containing information on patients diagnosed with AC who underwent LCBDE were included. A search for relevant articles was carried out, in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases. All studies included in the systematic review were assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. A total of 10 studies were included. Seven were retrospective and three were prospective. Only one was a randomized controlled trial. There were three studies that compared elective LCBDE and emergency LCBDE. Two studies compared between primary closure and T-tube drainage. Two other studies focused on the comparison between LCBDE and OCBDE. One study examined the comparison of LCBDE and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Another study addressed the issue of conversion in LCBDE. One study compared early and delayed LCBDE. Conversion rates ranged from 0% to 16.92%. Morbidity ranged from 0% to 26.3%, and mortality ranged from 0% to 3.07%. There was no difference in terms of retained, residual, or recurrent stones, bile leak, hemorrhage, and postoperative pancreatitis, and this, comparing the different groups of patients. Bile duct and intestinal injuries as well as biliary stricture were not common. The average length of hospital stays was approximately 5.86 days, ranging from 2 to 11.12 days. The one-stage urgent LCBDE, while subject to debate, proves to be a secure, feasible, approach for managing nonsevere AC.
在择期手术中,传统的开放式胆总管探查术(OCBDE)已被一种侵入性较小的手术方法即腹腔镜胆总管探查术(LCBDE)所取代。但目前,该技术在治疗急性胆管炎(AC)方面的应用被认为是新颖且存在争议的。我们系统评价的目的是研究腹腔镜手术治疗AC患者的安全性和有效性。纳入了包含接受LCBDE的AC诊断患者信息的研究。在Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和谷歌学术数据库中进行了相关文章的检索。系统评价中纳入的所有研究均使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华质量评估量表进行评估。共纳入10项研究。7项为回顾性研究,3项为前瞻性研究。仅有1项是随机对照试验。有3项研究比较了择期LCBDE和急诊LCBDE。2项研究比较了一期缝合和T管引流。另外2项研究聚焦于LCBDE和OCBDE之间的比较。1项研究考察了LCBDE和内镜逆行胰胆管造影术的比较。另一项研究探讨了LCBDE中的中转问题。1项研究比较了早期和延迟LCBDE。中转率为0%至16.92%。发病率为0%至26.3%,死亡率为0%至3.07%。在残留、复发结石、胆漏、出血和术后胰腺炎方面,不同组患者之间没有差异。胆管和肠道损伤以及胆管狭窄并不常见。平均住院时间约为5.86天,范围为2至11.12天。一期紧急LCBDE虽存在争议,但被证明是治疗非重症AC的一种安全、可行的方法。