Qiu Yufei, Wu Man, Liu Jiali, Li Chaoyang, Yu Yiqing, Zeng Lijuan, Yang Fen, Zhang Xiaohong, Chen Gang
School of Nursing, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430065, China.
Department of Nursing, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu 610014, China.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2025 Mar-Apr;93:9-19. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2024.12.022. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
Depression and anxiety are prevalent among older adults. However, most older adults have poor access to age-specific mental health services. While Information technology-based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT) has shown promise as an accessible alternative to face-to-face interventions, its effectiveness specifically within the older adults warrants further investigation.
To evaluate the effectiveness of ICBT on depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults.
Research articles retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE from inception to April 10, 2024, were reviewed. The search was designed to identify Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) that examined the efficacy of ICBT in reducing self-reported depression or anxiety symptoms in older adults. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials, version 2.0. Posttreatment means and standard deviations (SDs) were compared between intervention and control groups, and pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) were calculated.
A total of 11 RCTs were eligible for inclusion in this review. Compared to control groups, ICBT yielded small to medium post-treatment pooled effect sizes regarding depressive symptoms (Hedges' g = -0.65, 95 % CI -0.95 to -0.35; P < 0.001) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = -0.47, 95 % CI -0.74 to -0.19; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that: (1) interventions lasting ≥8 weeks (Hedges' g = -0.88, 95 % CI -1.37 to -0.39; P < 0.001) were more effective than <8 weeks for depressive symptoms; however, <8 weeks (Hedges' g = -0.52, 95 % CI -0.93 to -0.10; P = 0.014) was more effective for anxiety symptoms; (2) ICBT delivered through slideshows was more effective than through other digital platforms for both depressive (Hedges' g = -1.36, 95 % CI -2.40 to -0.31; P = 0.011) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = -1.00, 95 % CI -1.30 to -0.70; P < 0.001); and (3) non-tailored ICBT was more effective than tailored versions for both depressive (Hedges' g = -1.06, 95 % CI -2.03 to -0.09; P = 0.032) and anxiety symptoms (Hedges' g = -0.70, 95 % CI -1.14 to -0.27; P = 0.001).
This meta-analysis reinforces the effectiveness of ICBT in relieving depression and anxiety symptoms among older adults. Future research should identify the most effective components of ICBT to optimize their development.
抑郁症和焦虑症在老年人中普遍存在。然而,大多数老年人难以获得针对其年龄的心理健康服务。虽然基于信息技术的认知行为疗法(ICBT)已显示出有望成为面对面干预的一种可及替代方案,但其在老年人中的有效性仍需进一步研究。
评估ICBT对老年人抑郁和焦虑症状的有效性。
回顾了从创刊至2024年4月10日从PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、PsycINFO和MEDLINE检索到的研究文章。该检索旨在识别随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验考察了ICBT在减轻老年人自我报告的抑郁或焦虑症状方面的疗效。使用Cochrane随机试验偏倚风险工具2.0版评估纳入研究的质量。比较干预组和对照组的治疗后均值和标准差(SD),并计算合并效应量(Hedges' g)。
共有11项RCT符合纳入本综述的条件。与对照组相比,ICBT在抑郁症状(Hedges' g = -0.65,95% CI -0.95至-0.35;P < 0.001)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = -0.47,95% CI -0.74至-0.19;P < 0.001)方面产生了小到中等的治疗后合并效应量。亚组分析表明:(1)持续≥8周的干预(Hedges' g = -0.88,95% CI -1.37至-0.39;P < 0.001)在抑郁症状方面比<8周的干预更有效;然而,<8周(Hedges' g = -0.52,95% CI -0.93至-0.10;P = 0.014)在焦虑症状方面更有效;(2)通过幻灯片展示提供的ICBT在抑郁(Hedges' g = -1.36,95% CI -2.40至-0.31;P = 0.011)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = -1.00,95% CI -1.30至-0.70;P < 0.001)方面比通过其他数字平台更有效;(3)非定制的ICBT在抑郁(Hedges' g = -1.06,95% CI -2.03至-0.09;P = 0.032)和焦虑症状(Hedges' g = -0.70,95% CI -1.14至-0.27;P = 0.001)方面比定制版本更有效。
这项荟萃分析强化了ICBT在缓解老年人抑郁和焦虑症状方面的有效性。未来的研究应确定ICBT最有效的组成部分,以优化其发展。