Güvercin Yılmaz, Yaylacı Murat, Dizdar Ayberk, Özdemir Mehmet Emin, Ay Sevil, Yaylacı Ecren Uzun, Karahasanoğlu Umitcan, Uygun Hüseyin, Peker Gökhan
Department of Orthopaedic and Traumatology, Trabzon Kanuni Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.
Biomedical Engineering MSc Program, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize, Turkey.
Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):614-623. doi: 10.1111/os.14337. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
Despite several surgical options, there has yet to be a consensus on the best treatment for femoral neck fracture (FNF) due to higher complication rates compared to other bone fractures. This study aims to examine the possible consequences and solution suggestions of changing screws during surgery for various reasons in FNF surgical treatment from a biomechanical perspective.
FNF and treatment materials were analyzed biomechanically using a package program based on the finite element method (FEM). This study created a solid model with images of femur bone tomography. Dynamic hip screws (DHS), cannulated screws (CCS), and medial buttress plates (MBP) were obtained by making three-dimensional designs. The required elements for the models were assigned, and the material properties of the elements were defined. The solutions were obtained as crack distance and deformation results after defining the boundary conditions and applying the necessary loading.
The strain and crack distance values created by six models on the fracture line under different parameters were obtained, and the numerical results were evaluated. The DHS and CCS models produced the highest crack distance and deformation values when all screws were loose. The lowest values were obtained in the intact-85 model when all CCS were tight. When the results are evaluated, it is seen that the MBP has a decreasing effect on the results. Mechanical evaluation of six different options used in femoral neck fractures was performed. 85 mm CCS applied to our standard model gave the best results, while the use of 80 mm CCS in the same model showed promising results compared to other models. It is understood that CCS have the best stability even in loosening models with the medial support plate. Different models are from intact-85 mm DHS+1CS+MBP to DHS+1CS, which was worked with LSR+USR-2, according to decreasing stability.
This study offers various biomechanical solutions to possible intraoperative problems in FNF treatment. The following results were obtained from the study data. When the CCS needs to be lengthened or replaced, it is appropriate to use the CCS with the MBP. A single anti-rotation screw is sufficient for lag screw extensions of the DHS plate, and the MBP may be a savior procedure in surgery.
尽管有多种手术选择,但由于股骨颈骨折(FNF)与其他骨折相比并发症发生率较高,对于其最佳治疗方法尚未达成共识。本研究旨在从生物力学角度探讨FNF手术治疗中因各种原因在手术过程中更换螺钉可能产生的后果及解决建议。
使用基于有限元方法(FEM)的软件程序对FNF及治疗材料进行生物力学分析。本研究通过股骨骨断层扫描图像创建了实体模型。通过三维设计获得动力髋螺钉(DHS)、空心螺钉(CCS)和内侧支撑钢板(MBP)。为模型分配所需单元,并定义单元的材料属性。在定义边界条件并施加必要载荷后,获得裂纹距离和变形结果作为解决方案。
获得了六个模型在不同参数下骨折线上产生的应变和裂纹距离值,并对数值结果进行了评估。当所有螺钉松动时,DHS和CCS模型产生的裂纹距离和变形值最高。当所有CCS拧紧时,在完整-85模型中获得最低值。评估结果时发现,MBP对结果有降低作用。对股骨颈骨折中使用的六种不同方案进行了力学评估。应用于我们标准模型的85毫米CCS给出了最佳结果,而在同一模型中使用80毫米CCS与其他模型相比显示出有前景的结果。可以理解,即使在内侧支撑板的松动模型中,CCS也具有最佳稳定性。根据稳定性降低,不同模型从完整-85毫米DHS + 1CS + MBP到与LSR + USR - 2一起使用的DHS + 1CS。
本研究为FNF治疗中可能出现的术中问题提供了各种生物力学解决方案。从研究数据中得出以下结果。当需要延长或更换CCS时,适合使用带有MBP的CCS。对于DHS钢板的拉力螺钉延长,单个抗旋转螺钉就足够了,并且MBP在手术中可能是一种挽救措施。