Cai Lindi, Qiu Guanglin, Jiang Zhengdong, Zhao Pengwei, Zheng Zhongqiang, Zhu Mengke, Han Shangning, Chen Ni, Liao Xinhua, Che Xiangming, Li Xuqi, Fan Lin
Department of General Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, 277 Yanta West Road, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Pathology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, Shaanxi, China.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1351-1361. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11493-4. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
The traditional method of prophylactic loop ileostomy is time-consuming and prone to complications like stoma stenosis, peristomal adhesions, or dermatitis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical application value and potential benefits of a novel approach named linea alba support method (LASM) of prophylactic loop ileostomy via lower abdominal midline incision.
The clinical data of rectal cancer patients admitted to the General Surgery Department of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University between January 2021 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on different methods for prophylactic loop ileostomy they received, and clinical outcomes were further compared between the two groups.
A total of 102 patients, including 48 patients underwent LASM (LASM group) and 54 patients underwent traditional method (TM group) were included in this study. The LASM group exhibited significantly shorter operative time (201.8 vs. 223.0 min, p = 0.011), ileostomy time (10 vs. 22 min, p < 0.001), the length of postoperative visual incision (5 vs. 8 cm, p < 0.001), and operative time of stoma closure (75 vs. 90 min, p < 0.001) compared to the TM group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative complications and stoma-related complications. In addition, LASM was an independent influencing factor for shorter operative time of ileostomy.
LASM of prophylactic loop ileostomy via lower abdominal midline incision, seamlessly integrating simplicity, safety, and exceptional cosmetic outcomes, merits extensive promotion and adoption.
传统的预防性回肠造口术耗时较长,且容易出现诸如造口狭窄、造口周围粘连或皮炎等并发症。本研究旨在评估一种通过下腹部正中切口进行预防性回肠造口术的新方法——白线支撑法(LASM)的临床应用价值及潜在益处。
回顾性分析2021年1月至2023年12月在西安交通大学第一附属医院普通外科住院的直肠癌患者的临床资料。根据患者接受预防性回肠造口术的不同方法将其分为两组,并进一步比较两组的临床结局。
本研究共纳入102例患者,其中48例行LASM(LASM组),54例行传统方法(TM组)。与TM组相比,LASM组的手术时间(201.8 vs. 223.0分钟,p = 0.011)、回肠造口时间(10 vs. 22分钟,p < 0.001)、术后可见切口长度(5 vs. 8厘米,p < 0.001)及造口关闭手术时间(75 vs. 90分钟,p < 0.001)均显著缩短。两组术后并发症和造口相关并发症无显著差异。此外,LASM是回肠造口术手术时间较短的独立影响因素。
经下腹部正中切口行预防性回肠造口术的LASM,兼具简便性、安全性和出色的美容效果,值得广泛推广应用。