Ayasse Timothée, Gaugain Samuel, de Roquetaillade Charles, Hermans-Didier Alexis, Kindermans Manuel, Chousterman Benjamin G, Barthélémy Romain
AP-HP, Hôpital Lariboisière, Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Paris, France.
Université de Paris, Inserm, UMRS 942 Mascot, Paris, France.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025 Jun;45(6):1059-1068. doi: 10.1177/0271678X241310780. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
In patients with acute brain injury (ABI), optimizing cerebral perfusion parameters relies on multimodal monitoring. This include data from systemic monitoring-mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO), hemoglobin levels (Hb), and temperature-as well as neurological monitoring-intracranial pressure (ICP), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), and transcranial Doppler (TCD) velocities. We hypothesized that these parameters alone were not sufficient to assess the risk of cerebral ischemia. We conducted a retrospective, single-center study of patients admitted in our ICU between 2015 and 2021. Patients with ABI and multimodal neuromonitoring were included. ABI included traumatic brain injury (TBI), subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), intracranial hemorrhage and ischemic stroke. The relationship between jugular venous oxygen saturation (SjvO) and cerebral perfusion parameters was analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on SjvO, with a threshold of 60% used to define cerebral ischemia. We compared the parameters used to optimize cerebral perfusion between groups and their diagnosis accuracy for cerebral ischemia was evaluated. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the association between the guideline-recommended therapeutic targets and the risk of cerebral ischemia. 601 evaluations from 96 patients with simultaneous ICP, SjvO and TCD were analyzed. Poor relationships were found between SjvO and the parameters of cerebral perfusion. TCD flow velocities and PaCO were lower in the cerebral ischemia group while MAP, ICP and CPP were not different between groups. Most ischemic episodes occurred despite ICP < 22 mmHg and CPP ≥ 60 mmHg. For the diagnosis of cerebral ischemia, only TCD parameters and PaCO were associated with an area under the curve (AUC) > 0.5 but with a low accuracy. In multivariable analysis, the only guideline-recommended therapeutic target associated with a reduction of cerebral ischemia was a diastolic flow velocity (FV) > 20 cm.s.
在急性脑损伤(ABI)患者中,优化脑灌注参数依赖于多模态监测。这包括来自全身监测的数据——平均动脉压(MAP)、动脉二氧化碳分压(PaCO)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO)、血红蛋白水平(Hb)和体温——以及神经监测数据——颅内压(ICP)、脑灌注压(CPP)和经颅多普勒(TCD)血流速度。我们假设仅这些参数不足以评估脑缺血风险。我们对2015年至2021年期间入住我们重症监护病房的患者进行了一项回顾性单中心研究。纳入了接受ABI和多模态神经监测的患者。ABI包括创伤性脑损伤(TBI)、蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)、颅内出血和缺血性中风。分析了颈静脉血氧饱和度(SjvO)与脑灌注参数之间的关系。根据SjvO将患者分为两组,以60%作为定义脑缺血的阈值。我们比较了两组之间用于优化脑灌注的参数,并评估了它们对脑缺血的诊断准确性。进行单变量和多变量分析以评估指南推荐的治疗目标与脑缺血风险之间的关联。对96例同时进行ICP、SjvO和TCD监测的患者的601次评估进行了分析。发现SjvO与脑灌注参数之间关系不佳。脑缺血组的TCD血流速度和PaCO较低,而两组之间的MAP、ICP和CPP无差异。尽管ICP<22 mmHg且CPP≥60 mmHg,但大多数缺血事件仍会发生。对于脑缺血的诊断,只有TCD参数和PaCO与曲线下面积(AUC)>0.5相关,但准确性较低。在多变量分析中,与脑缺血减少相关的唯一指南推荐治疗目标是舒张期血流速度(FV)>20 cm·s。