Prioul Valentin, Slawinski Jean, Guersent Steeve, Le Monnier Laure, Goeb Vincent, Krim Florent, Lopes Philippe, Leprêtre Pierre-Marie
Faculty of Sciences and Techniques in Physical Activities and Sports, Research Unit of Physiological Adaptations to Exercise (APERE, EA-3300), University of Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France.
National Training Center and Talent Detection, French Federation of American Football, Amiens, France.
Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Dec 23;6:1466118. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1466118. eCollection 2024.
The teams' collective playing strategy rather than the individual player attitudes could explain event outcome and risk of injuries.
The study aimed to examine the playing style of European teams and compare it to the USA.
12 matches from the U19 European championship of American Football were analysed. We characterized each team by their running-passing activities ratio during the offensive phase: running (RUN), passing (PASS), or balanced (BAL).
The BAL style of play accurately described 75% of European teams ( = 6). The remaining two national teams adopted either the RUN or PASS style of play. This finding is similar to what was observed in NCAA Division IA. All RUN style teams had a higher percentage of rushing plays (80.7% ± 9.7%) compared to PASS (33.0% ± 14.7%) and BAL teams (46.0 ± 0.8%) ( < 0.05). The mean playing time for RUN and PASS teams was longer than the average duration of plays for BAL teams ( < 0.05). The mean duration of plays ranged from 5.3 ± 1.9 to 5.7 ± 2.1 s, with a significant style of play effect ( < 0.05). Rest duration for BAL teams (46.7 ± 44.1 s) was shorter than that of RUN (55.9 ± 34.7 s) and PASS (54.5 ± 32.9 s) teams ( < 0.05). Finally, the European top final team was the team that was able to shift their game style during the tournament and presented a low coefficient of variation in offensive plays per drive.
Based on the running-passing activities ratio, the video match analysis can provide a foundation for the strength and conditioning program for long-term athlete development and injury prevention.
球队的集体比赛策略而非球员个人态度可以解释比赛结果和受伤风险。
本研究旨在考察欧洲球队的比赛风格,并与美国球队进行比较。
分析了12场U19欧洲美式足球锦标赛的比赛。我们根据各球队在进攻阶段的跑传活动比例对其进行特征描述:跑攻(RUN)、传攻(PASS)或平衡(BAL)。
平衡比赛风格准确描述了75%的欧洲球队(n = 6)。其余两支国家队采用跑攻或传攻比赛风格。这一发现与美国大学体育协会第一分区(NCAA Division IA)的观察结果相似。与传攻(33.0%±14.7%)和平衡(46.0±0.8%)球队相比,所有跑攻风格球队的冲球比例更高(80.7%±9.