Orandi Amir Hossein, Mansour Amirpasha, Bagheri Nima, Majedi Hossein, Emami Meibodi Seyed Ali, Pestehei Seyed Khalil, Saberian Peyman
Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Joint Reconstruction Research Center, Department of Orthopedics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2024 Dec 20;9(1):rkae150. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkae150. eCollection 2025.
Rotator cuff tendinitis (RCT) is a tendon inflammation often following subacromial impingement syndrome. One of the non-surgical management modalities for RCT is subacromial injection of corticosteroids. Some studies have claimed a correlation between ACTH (Adrenocorticotropic Hormone) deficiency and rotator cuff lesions; hence, intramuscular ACTH analogue injection has been recommended as an option. This research aimed to compare the effectiveness of these two treatment methods.
We conducted a study with 86 patients suffering from RCT. The patients were randomly divided into two groups of 43; one group received a subacromial injection of 40 mg of triamcinolone acetonide, while the other group received 1 mg of intramuscular tetracosactide injection. We recorded the Constant-Murley (CM) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for each patient before and 4 weeks after injections to measure pain acuity and joint functionality. Later, we compared and analysed the two scores in each group.
Based on the statistical analysis, the mean ages of the participants in the triamcinolone and tetracosactide groups were 53.21 ± 11.37 and 54.56 ± 11.98, respectively. Both groups demonstrated an improvement in VAS for pain and CM scores ( < 0.05). However, the VAS for pain score decreased, and the CM score increased more significantly in the triamcinolone group than in the tetracosactide group ( < 0.05).
Although both treatment methods exhibit promise for pain relief, subacromial injection of triamcinolone appears more efficacious than intramuscular injection of tetracosactide in patients with RCT, based on a 4-week follow-up.
Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir, IRCT20240110060673N1.
肩袖肌腱炎(RCT)是一种常继发于肩峰下撞击综合征的肌腱炎症。RCT的非手术治疗方式之一是肩峰下注射皮质类固醇。一些研究称促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)缺乏与肩袖损伤之间存在关联;因此,已推荐肌肉注射ACTH类似物作为一种选择。本研究旨在比较这两种治疗方法的有效性。
我们对86例RCT患者进行了一项研究。患者被随机分为两组,每组43例;一组接受肩峰下注射40mg曲安奈德,另一组接受1mg肌肉注射替可克肽。我们记录了每位患者注射前及注射后4周的Constant-Murley(CM)评分和视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分,以测量疼痛敏锐度和关节功能。随后,我们对每组的两项评分进行了比较和分析。
基于统计分析,曲安奈德组和替可克肽组参与者的平均年龄分别为53.21±11.37岁和54.56±11.98岁。两组的疼痛VAS评分和CM评分均有改善(P<0.05)。然而,曲安奈德组的疼痛VAS评分下降且CM评分升高比替可克肽组更显著(P<0.05)。
尽管两种治疗方法在缓解疼痛方面都有前景,但基于4周的随访,对于RCT患者,肩峰下注射曲安奈德似乎比肌肉注射替可克肽更有效。
伊朗临床试验注册中心,https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir,IRCT20240110060673N1。