Mamede Lucia, Rangel Gabriel W, Shinyuy Lahngong Methodius, Boussif Naïma, Herent Marie-France, Govaerts Bernadette, Jansen Olivia, Ledoux Allison, De Tullio Pascal, Quetin-Leclercq Joëlle, Llinás Manuel, Frédérich Michel
Laboratory of Pharmacognosy, Center of Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM), University of Liège, CIRM Laboratoire de Pharmacognosie CHU B36 Av Hopital 1, Liege B36 4000, Belgium; Pharmacognosy research group, Louvain Drug Research Institute (LDRI), Université catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and Huck Center for Malaria Research (CMaR), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Phytomedicine. 2025 Jan;136:156361. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2025.156361. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
Artemisia spp. have been used for millennia in traditional medicine to treat a variety of ailments, including malaria. Extracts of Artemisia afra and A. annua remain widely used throughout Africa for healthcare purposes, notably to prevent and/or treat malaria. However, the modes of action of these plant extracts remain unclear, with contradictory reports regarding the presence and role of artemisinin in both plants.
The aim of this study was to identify differences in the antimalarial mode of action of A. afra and A. annua by measuring their phenolic profiles and comparing their effect on parasite metabolism in vitro.
In this work, we analyzed the phenolic profile of A. afra and A. annua extracts through high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), detected and quantified artemisinin through HPLC and mass spectrometry (MS), and performed comparative HPLC-MS metabolomic analysis on in vitro-cultured Plasmodium falciparum trophozoites to elucidate the potential modes of action of these plant extracts.
A. afra contained only trace amounts of artemisinin and elicited a different parasite metabolic response compared to A. annua, which contained significantly more artemisinin and correlated closely with the parasite response profile elicited by purified artemisinin. A. annua impacted parasite glutathione metabolism in agreement with the established redox activity of artemisinin, while A. afra had an effect on lipid precursors.
This study reveals that A. afra and A. annua have divergent effects on Plasmodium falciparum metabolism and provides support for ongoing efforts exploring the use of A. afra for the treatment of malaria.
蒿属植物在传统医学中已被使用了数千年,用于治疗包括疟疾在内的多种疾病。在整个非洲,南非蒿和青蒿的提取物仍被广泛用于医疗保健目的,尤其是预防和/或治疗疟疾。然而,这些植物提取物的作用方式仍不清楚,关于这两种植物中青蒿素的存在和作用存在相互矛盾的报道。
本研究的目的是通过测量南非蒿和青蒿的酚类成分,并比较它们对体外寄生虫代谢的影响,来确定它们抗疟作用方式的差异。
在这项工作中,我们通过高效液相色谱法(HPLC)分析了南非蒿和青蒿提取物的酚类成分,通过HPLC和质谱法(MS)检测并定量了青蒿素,并对体外培养的恶性疟原虫滋养体进行了比较HPLC-MS代谢组学分析,以阐明这些植物提取物的潜在作用方式。
南非蒿仅含有微量青蒿素,与青蒿相比,其引发的寄生虫代谢反应不同,青蒿中青蒿素含量显著更高,且与纯化青蒿素引发的寄生虫反应谱密切相关。青蒿对寄生虫谷胱甘肽代谢的影响与青蒿素既定的氧化还原活性一致,而南非蒿对脂质前体有影响。
本研究表明,南非蒿和青蒿对恶性疟原虫代谢有不同影响,并为正在进行的探索使用南非蒿治疗疟疾的努力提供了支持。