POCUS-first in acute diverticulitis: Quantifying cost savings, length-of-stay reduction, and radiation risk mitigation in the ED.

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have validated the efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) as an alternative diagnostic imaging approach to computed tomography (CT) for patients with suspected acute diverticulitis. This study aimed to quantify the national impact of this approach in cost savings, ED length-of-stay (LOS), and radiation risk mitigation using a POCUS-first approach for acute diverticulitis in the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Using published data, we constructed a Monte Carlo simulation model to compare two POCUS-first strategies (nonselective and selective approaches) for evaluating patients with suspected acute diverticulitis in the ED. Primary outcomes were cost savings, reduction in ED LOS, and radiation risk mitigation.

RESULTS

In our simulation model, both nonselective and selective POCUS-first strategies showed substantial potential reductions in the annual number of CTs. Notably, the selective approach led to significantly fewer estimated POCUS examinations (433,847 ± 45,103 exams vs 720,048 ± 55,815 exams, p < 0.001) resulting in greater cost savings ($94,620,235 ± $10,090,807 vs $70,017,473 ± $11,583,911, p < 0.001) and greater reductions in ED LOS (508,569 ± 640,048 bed-hours vs 332,518 ± 774,485 bed-hours, p < 0.001). Reduction in radiation exposure was comparable between the two approaches (8,779,414 ± 2,389,982 mSv vs 8,846,058 ± 2,420,185 mSv, p = 0.536).

CONCLUSION

Both POCUS-first models can achieve substantial national annual cost savings, ED LOS reduction, and decreases in radiation exposure compared to the traditional CT-first approach. POCUS should be strongly considered as a first-line imaging modality for acute diverticulitis especially among low-risk patients.