Megson David, Bruce-Vanderpuije Pennante, Idowu Ifeoluwa Grace, Ekpe Okon Dominic, Sandau Courtney D
Chemistry Matters, Calgary, Canada; Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Chemistry Matters, Calgary, Canada; Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Water Research Institute, Accra, Ghana.
Sci Total Environ. 2025 Jan 15;960:178240. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178240. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
This review follows the PRISMA guidelines to provide a systematic review of 115 peer reviewed articles that used non-targeted analysis (NTA) methods to detect per- and polyfluoroalkylated substances (PFAS). This literature highlights the significant positive impact of NTA in understanding PFAS in the environment. Within the literature a geographical bias exists, with most NTA studies (∼60 %) conducted in the United States and China. Future studies in other regions (such as South America and Africa) are needed to gain a more global understanding. More research is required in marine environments and the atmosphere, as current studies focus mainly on freshwater, groundwater, soil, and sediments. The majority of studies focus on measuring PFAS in the environment, rather than in commercial products (with the exception of AFFF). Non-lethal blood sampling has been successful for NTA in humans and wildlife, but additional biomonitoring studies are required on exposed cohorts to understand health risks and PFAS biotransformation pathways. NTA methods mostly use liquid chromatography and negative ionisation, which biases the literature towards the detection of specific PFAS. Despite improvements in data reporting and quality assurance and control (QA/QC) procedures, factors such as false negative and false positive rates are often overlooked, and many NTA workflows remain highly subjective. Perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) and perfluoroalkyl sulfonic acids (PFSAs) are the most detected PFAS classes, identified in over 80 % of NTA studies, and are common in routine monitoring. However, our review identified >1000 PFAS from a total of 382 different PFAS classes, with over 300 classes found in fewer than 5 % of studies. This highlights the variety of different PFAS present in the environment, and the limitations of relying solely on targeted methods. Future monitoring programs and regulations would benefit from considering NTA methods to provide more comprehensive information on PFAS present in the environment.
本综述遵循PRISMA指南,对115篇使用非靶向分析(NTA)方法检测全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的同行评审文章进行了系统综述。该文献强调了NTA在了解环境中PFAS方面的重大积极影响。在文献中存在地理偏差,大多数NTA研究(约60%)在美国和中国进行。需要在其他地区(如南美洲和非洲)开展更多研究,以获得更全面的全球认识。海洋环境和大气方面需要更多研究,因为目前的研究主要集中在淡水、地下水、土壤和沉积物上。大多数研究侧重于测量环境中的PFAS,而非商业产品中的PFAS(含氟泡沫灭火剂除外)。非致死性血液采样在人类和野生动物的NTA研究中已取得成功,但需要对暴露人群进行更多生物监测研究,以了解健康风险和PFAS生物转化途径。NTA方法大多使用液相色谱和负离子化,这使得文献在特定PFAS的检测上存在偏差。尽管数据报告以及质量保证和控制(QA/QC)程序有所改进,但假阴性和假阳性率等因素常常被忽视,而且许多NTA工作流程仍然主观性很强。全氟烷基羧酸(PFCA)和全氟烷基磺酸(PFSA)是检测到的最常见的PFAS类别,在超过80%的NTA研究中被识别出来,并且在常规监测中很常见。然而,我们的综述从总共382种不同的PFAS类别中识别出了1000多种PFAS,其中超过300种类别在不到5%的研究中被发现。这突出了环境中存在的不同PFAS的多样性,以及仅依赖靶向方法的局限性。未来的监测计划和法规若能考虑NTA方法,将有助于提供有关环境中PFAS的更全面信息。