Niault Theophile, van Houte Stineke, Westra Edze, Swarts Daan C
Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Environment and Sustainability Institute, Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn TR10 9FE, UK.
Curr Biol. 2025 Jan 6;35(1):R32-R44. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.11.033.
Prokaryotes (Bacteria and Archaea) encode a highly diversified arsenal of defence systems that protect them against mobile genetic elements, such as phages and plasmids. In turn, mobile genetic elements encode anti-defence systems that allow them to escape the activity of these defence systems. This has resulted in an evolutionary arms race in which defence systems and anti-defence systems evolve and adapt continuously, driving intriguing innovation and enormous diversification on both sides. Over 150 prokaryotic defence systems have been identified to date. Anti-defence systems are known for only a subset of these, but more are being discovered at a steady rate. Despite an increasing understanding of the highly diverse molecular mechanisms of anti-defence systems, their diverse evolutionary origins, the selective pressures they are subjected to, and their ecological importance and implications often remain obscure. In this review, we describe the diverse strategies that phage and plasmid anti-defence systems employ to escape host defence systems. We explore the evolutionary origins of anti-defence systems and describe different factors that exert selective pressure, affecting their maintenance and diversification. We describe how, in turn, defence systems themselves evolved to act upon anti-defence mechanisms, thereby adding a new layer to the co-evolutionary battle between prokaryotes and their mobile genetic elements. We discuss how the continuous selective pressures found in dynamic microbial communities promote the retention and diversification of these anti-defence systems. Finally, we consider the ecological implications for both hosts and their mobile genetic elements, noting how the balance of defence and anti-defence strategies can shape microbial community composition, influence horizontal gene transfer, and impact ecosystem stability.
原核生物(细菌和古细菌)编码了高度多样化的防御系统库,以保护它们免受移动遗传元件(如噬菌体和质粒)的侵害。反过来,移动遗传元件编码反防御系统,使它们能够逃避这些防御系统的作用。这导致了一场进化军备竞赛,其中防御系统和反防御系统不断进化和适应,推动了双方引人入胜的创新和巨大的多样化。迄今为止,已鉴定出150多种原核生物防御系统。反防御系统仅在其中一部分中为人所知,但正在以稳定的速度发现更多。尽管对反防御系统高度多样的分子机制、它们多样的进化起源、它们所承受的选择压力以及它们的生态重要性和影响的理解不断增加,但这些方面往往仍然模糊不清。在本综述中,我们描述了噬菌体和质粒反防御系统用于逃避宿主防御系统的多种策略。我们探索了反防御系统的进化起源,并描述了施加选择压力、影响其维持和多样化的不同因素。我们描述了防御系统本身如何反过来进化以作用于反防御机制,从而为原核生物与其移动遗传元件之间的共同进化斗争增添了新的层面。我们讨论了动态微生物群落中发现的持续选择压力如何促进这些反防御系统的保留和多样化。最后,我们考虑了对宿主及其移动遗传元件的生态影响,指出防御和反防御策略的平衡如何塑造微生物群落组成、影响水平基因转移并影响生态系统稳定性。