Zhang Q, Wang H, Zhang Y M, Li X L, Shen Y Y, Wei N, Zou K, Su W X, Dai H P, Wu D P, Liu L M
Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou 215128, China.
Soochow Hopes Hematonosis Hospital, Suzhou 215128, China The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, Key Laboratory of Thrombosis and Hemostasis of Ministry of Health, Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Suzhou 215006, China.
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2024 Dec 14;45(12):1113-1118. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20240424-00161.
This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between high-dose intravenous iron and oral iron in treating iron deficiency anemia (IDA) . This prospective randomized controlled study (1∶1) enrolled 338 patients with IDA at The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou Hongci Hematology Hospital, and Huai'an Second People's Hospital from June 1, 2022, to January 19, 2024. Of all the patients, 169 received high-dose intravenous iron therapy and 169 received oral iron treatment for 12 weeks of observation. Focus on the hemoglobin (HGB) change from baseline to week 4, secondary focus was on the HGB and iron metabolism parameters (serum iron [SI], transferrin saturation [TSAT], total iron binding force [TIBC], serum ferritin [SF]), and changes in the fatigue score, efficacy, and treatment-related adverse effects were monitored throughout in the two treatment groups. The HGB levels were improved in both treatments, but the HGB improved faster in the intravenous group compared with the oral group. HGB increased from (76.8±15.0) g/L to (118.0±13.3) g/L in the intravenous group and from (77.9±11.6) g/L to (104.3±15.0) g/L in the oral group after 4 weeks of treatment. The increase from baseline in the intravenous group (40.7±17.3) g/L was significantly higher than that in the oral group (27.2±17.5) g/L (<0.001). The intravenous group demonstrated a more significant early effect than the oral group in terms of iron metabolism parameter improvement. SI, TSAT, TBIC, and SF increased better from baseline at 4 weeks in the intravenous group than in the oral group (<0.001). Additionally, the intravenous group exhibited better fatigue scores for early improvement than the oral group (<0.001). The incidence of total adverse effects was similar in the intravenous group as compared to the oral group (3.5% [6/169] 5.9% [10/169], =0.442) . High doses of intravenous iron quickly boost HGB early, causing rapid improvement in SI, TSAT, TBIC, SF, and patient fatigue scores. The patient was well tolerated.
本研究旨在比较高剂量静脉铁剂与口服铁剂治疗缺铁性贫血(IDA)的疗效和安全性。这项前瞻性随机对照研究(1∶1)于2022年6月1日至2024年1月19日在苏州大学附属第一医院、苏州弘慈血液病医院和淮安市第二人民医院纳入了338例IDA患者。所有患者中,169例接受高剂量静脉铁剂治疗,169例接受口服铁剂治疗,观察12周。重点关注从基线到第4周血红蛋白(HGB)的变化,次要重点是HGB和铁代谢参数(血清铁[SI]、转铁蛋白饱和度[TSAT]、总铁结合力[TIBC]、血清铁蛋白[SF]),并在两个治疗组中全程监测疲劳评分、疗效及治疗相关不良反应的变化。两种治疗方法的HGB水平均有所改善,但静脉组的HGB改善速度比口服组更快。治疗4周后,静脉组的HGB从(76.8±15.0)g/L升至(118.0±13.3)g/L,口服组从(77.9±11.6)g/L升至(104.3±15.0)g/L。静脉组相对于基线的升高幅度(40.7±17.3)g/L显著高于口服组(27.2±17.5)g/L(<0.001)。在铁代谢参数改善方面,静脉组早期效果比口服组更显著。静脉组在第4周时,SI、TSAT、TBIC和SF相对于基线的升高情况比口服组更好(<0.001)。此外,静脉组早期疲劳评分改善情况比口服组更好(<0.001)。静脉组与口服组的总不良反应发生率相似(3.5%[6/169]对5.9%[10/169],P = 0.442)。高剂量静脉铁剂能在早期迅速提高HGB水平,使SI、TSAT、TBIC、SF及患者疲劳评分快速改善。患者耐受性良好。