Jacques Louis
Clinic of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Montreal University Hospital Center, Montreal, QC H2X 0C1, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Montreal University, Montreal, QC H3T 1J4, Canada.
Brain Sci. 2024 Dec 16;14(12):1261. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14121261.
The etiology of multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is still debated, which is an obstacle to assessing treatment options. An analysis of the scientific literature combined with the clinical experience can suggest some avenues.
The etiology of MCS and its underlying mechanisms were reviewed from the scientific literature to identify the main factors contributing to its development. The results of the studies involving biomarkers and cerebral imaging techniques on MCS subjects were compared with those performed on subjects having the comorbidities of MCS. From the scientific literature and the experience in a clinical setting in occupational and environmental medicine, distinct types of MCS were looked for, with the application of the underlying mechanisms. The potential effectiveness of available treatments was also reviewed.
Among many factors, unresolved emotional traumas causing chronic and acute stress reactions play an important role in the development of MCS and can be the basis for effective treatment. We identified three types of clinical presentations, called the accidental type, following a toxic exposure causing an associated emotional trauma, the associative type, following a repeated innocuous exposure in a threatening context, and the developmental type, following a traumatic childhood/adolescence causing hypervigilance and chronic stress/trauma-related disorders. We presented real cases to illustrate these types and the mechanisms behind their development, as well as effective resolution.
MCS and its comorbidities could be treated effectively when the underlying emotional trauma(s) are targeted using trauma-focused psychotherapy and other therapies. Diagnostic criteria, principles of treatment and prevention, and avenues for research were derived from this analysis.
多重化学物质敏感(MCS)的病因仍存在争议,这是评估治疗方案的一个障碍。结合科学文献与临床经验进行分析,可能会找到一些途径。
从科学文献中回顾MCS的病因及其潜在机制,以确定导致其发生发展的主要因素。将针对MCS受试者的生物标志物和脑成像技术研究结果,与针对患有MCS合并症的受试者所开展的研究结果进行比较。根据科学文献以及职业与环境医学临床实践经验,运用潜在机制寻找不同类型的MCS。同时还回顾了现有治疗方法的潜在有效性。
在诸多因素中,未解决的情感创伤引发慢性和急性应激反应,在MCS的发生发展中起重要作用,且可为有效治疗提供依据。我们确定了三种临床类型,即意外型,因有毒物质暴露引发相关情感创伤所致;关联型,在有威胁的环境中反复无害暴露后发生;发育型,在童年/青少年期遭受创伤后导致过度警觉以及慢性应激/创伤相关障碍。我们列举了实际病例来说明这些类型及其发展背后的机制,以及有效的解决方法。
当使用以创伤为重点的心理治疗和其他疗法针对潜在的情感创伤时,MCS及其合并症可得到有效治疗。基于此分析得出了诊断标准、治疗与预防原则以及研究途径。