• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于费舍尔信息的项目反应理论中黑伍德案例的定义。

A Definition of a Heywood Case in Item Response Theory Based on Fisher Information.

作者信息

Verkuilen Jay, Johnson Peter J

机构信息

Ph.D. Program in Educational Psychology, CUNY Graduate Center, New York, NY 10016, USA.

出版信息

Entropy (Basel). 2024 Dec 14;26(12):1096. doi: 10.3390/e26121096.

DOI:10.3390/e26121096
PMID:39766725
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11675695/
Abstract

Heywood cases and other improper solutions occur frequently in latent variable models, e.g., factor analysis, item response theory, latent class analysis, multilevel models, or structural equation models, all of which are models with response variables taken from an exponential family. They have important consequences for scoring with the latent variable model and are indicative of issues in a model, such as poor identification or model misspecification. In the context of the 2PL and 3PL models in IRT, they are more frequently known as Guttman items and are identified by having a discrimination parameter that is deemed excessively large. Other IRT models, such as the newer asymmetric item response theory (AsymIRT) or polytomous IRT models often have parameters that are not easy to interpret directly, so scanning parameter estimates are not necessarily indicative of the presence of problematic values. The graphical examination of the IRF can be useful but is necessarily subjective and highly dependent on choices of graphical defaults. We propose using the derivatives of the IRF, item Fisher information functions, and our proposed Item Fraction of Total Information (IFTI) decomposition metric to bypass the parameters, allowing for the more concrete and consistent identification of Heywood cases. We illustrate the approach by using empirical examples by using AsymIRT and nominal response models.

摘要

海伍德情况及其他不合适的解在潜变量模型中经常出现,例如在因子分析、项目反应理论、潜在类别分析、多层模型或结构方程模型中,所有这些都是响应变量取自指数族的模型。它们对潜变量模型评分有重要影响,并且表明模型存在问题,如识别性差或模型设定错误。在IRT的2PL和3PL模型背景下,它们更常被称为古特曼项目,其特征是具有被认为过大的区分参数。其他IRT模型,如较新的非对称项目反应理论(AsymIRT)或多分类IRT模型,其参数往往不易直接解释,因此扫描参数估计值不一定表明存在问题值。对项目反应函数(IRF)进行图形检查可能有用,但必然具有主观性,且高度依赖于图形默认设置的选择。我们建议使用IRF的导数、项目费希尔信息函数以及我们提出的总信息项目分数(IFTI)分解度量来绕过参数,从而更具体、一致地识别海伍德情况。我们通过使用AsymIRT和名义反应模型的实证例子来说明该方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/680a327a6e4e/entropy-26-01096-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/4c27f909f735/entropy-26-01096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/05a5f510f7f7/entropy-26-01096-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/2bea8f23debb/entropy-26-01096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/fdc7653a92a6/entropy-26-01096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/fe296940c131/entropy-26-01096-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/f28a23da73ed/entropy-26-01096-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/258ac01ba8d3/entropy-26-01096-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/82c86ad46a3a/entropy-26-01096-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/680a327a6e4e/entropy-26-01096-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/4c27f909f735/entropy-26-01096-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/05a5f510f7f7/entropy-26-01096-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/2bea8f23debb/entropy-26-01096-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/fdc7653a92a6/entropy-26-01096-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/fe296940c131/entropy-26-01096-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/f28a23da73ed/entropy-26-01096-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/258ac01ba8d3/entropy-26-01096-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/82c86ad46a3a/entropy-26-01096-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b2bb/11675695/680a327a6e4e/entropy-26-01096-g009.jpg

相似文献

1
A Definition of a Heywood Case in Item Response Theory Based on Fisher Information.基于费舍尔信息的项目反应理论中黑伍德案例的定义。
Entropy (Basel). 2024 Dec 14;26(12):1096. doi: 10.3390/e26121096.
2
Investigating Confidence Intervals of Item Parameters When Some Item Parameters Take Priors in the 2PL and 3PL Models.在2PL和3PL模型中某些项目参数具有先验值时研究项目参数的置信区间
Educ Psychol Meas. 2023 Apr;83(2):375-400. doi: 10.1177/00131644221096431. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.测试与样本特征对多级混合IRT模型中模型选择及分类准确性的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Feb 14;11:197. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00197. eCollection 2020.
4
Heywood Cases in Unidimensional Factor Models and Item Response Models for Binary Data.二元数据的一维因子模型和项目反应模型中的海伍德案例。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Mar;47(2):141-154. doi: 10.1177/01466216231151701. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
5
An item analysis of the Conditional Reasoning Test of Aggression.攻击性条件推理测试的项目分析。
J Appl Psychol. 2015 Nov;100(6):1872-86. doi: 10.1037/apl0000026. Epub 2015 May 25.
6
A primer on standardized testing: .标准化测试入门:
J Chiropr Educ. 2019 Oct;33(2):151-163. doi: 10.7899/JCE-18-22. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
7
Mixture IRT Model With a Higher-Order Structure for Latent Traits.具有潜在特质高阶结构的混合IRT模型
Educ Psychol Meas. 2017 Apr;77(2):275-304. doi: 10.1177/0013164416640327. Epub 2016 Apr 1.
8
Robust Measurement via A Fused Latent and Graphical Item Response Theory Model.通过融合潜在变量和图形项目反应理论模型进行稳健测量。
Psychometrika. 2018 Sep;83(3):538-562. doi: 10.1007/s11336-018-9610-4. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
9
A Bayesian Robust IRT Outlier-Detection Model.一种贝叶斯稳健IRT异常值检测模型。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 May;41(3):195-208. doi: 10.1177/0146621616679394. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
10
Parameter Estimation Accuracy of the Effort-Moderated Item Response Theory Model Under Multiple Assumption Violations.多重假设违背下努力调节项目反应理论模型的参数估计准确性
Educ Psychol Meas. 2021 Jun;81(3):569-594. doi: 10.1177/0013164420949896. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Heywood Cases in Unidimensional Factor Models and Item Response Models for Binary Data.二元数据的一维因子模型和项目反应模型中的海伍德案例。
Appl Psychol Meas. 2023 Mar;47(2):141-154. doi: 10.1177/01466216231151701. Epub 2023 Jan 29.
2
Parsimonious asymmetric item response theory modeling with the complementary log-log link.简约非对称项目反应理论模型与互补对数链接。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Jan;55(1):200-219. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-01824-5. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
3
Item Complexity: A Neglected Psychometric Feature of Test Items?
项目复杂性:被忽视的测验项目心理计量学特征?
Psychometrika. 2022 Dec;87(4):1195-1213. doi: 10.1007/s11336-022-09842-0. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
4
The Fisher information function and scoring in binary ideal point item response models: a cautionary tale.Fisher 信息量函数和二分理想点项目反应模型中的评分:一个警示故事。
Br J Math Stat Psychol. 2022 Feb;75(1):182-197. doi: 10.1111/bmsp.12254. Epub 2021 Oct 23.
5
The Heteroscedastic Graded Response Model with a Skewed Latent Trait: Testing Statistical and Substantive Hypotheses Related to Skewed Item Category Functions.带有偏态潜在特质的异方差分级反应模型:检验与偏态项目类别函数相关的统计和实质假设。
Psychometrika. 2012 Jul;77(3):455-78. doi: 10.1007/s11336-012-9273-5. Epub 2012 May 19.
6
Measuring Latent Quantities.测量潜在数量。
Psychometrika. 2011 Oct;76(4):511-36. doi: 10.1007/s11336-011-9223-7.