Suppr超能文献

基于挥发性化合物的植物性饮料分类

Classification of Plant-Based Drinks Based on Volatile Compounds.

作者信息

Papp Zsigmond, Nemeth Laura Gabriela, Nzetchouang Siyapndjeu Sandrine, Bufa Anita, Marosvölgyi Tamás, Gyöngyi Zoltán

机构信息

Department of Public Health Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Szigeti út 12, 7624 Pécs, Hungary.

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs, Vörösmarty u. 4, 7621 Pécs, Hungary.

出版信息

Foods. 2024 Dec 17;13(24):4086. doi: 10.3390/foods13244086.

Abstract

The increasing popularity of plant-based drinks has led to an expanded consumer market. However, available quality control technologies for plant-based drinks are time-consuming and expensive. Two alternative quality control methods, gas chromatography with ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS) and an electronic nose, were used to assess 111 plant-based drink samples. Principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA) were used to compare 58 volatile organic compound areas of GC-IMS gallery plots and 63 peptide sensors of the electronic nose. PCA results showed that GC-IMS was only able to completely separate one sample, whereas the electronic nose was able to completely separate seven samples. LDA application to GC-IMS analyses resulted in classification accuracies ranging from 15.4% to 100%, whereas application to electronic nose analyses resulted in accuracies ranging from 96.2% to 100%. Both methods were useful for classification, but each had drawbacks, and the electronic nose performed slightly better than GC-IMS. This study represents one of the first studies comparing GC-IMS and an electronic nose for the analysis of plant-based drinks. Further research is necessary to improve these methods and establish a rapid, cost-effective food quality control system based on volatile organic compounds.

摘要

植物基饮品日益普及,使得消费市场不断扩大。然而,现有的植物基饮品质量控制技术既耗时又昂贵。两种替代质量控制方法,即气相色谱-离子迁移谱联用技术(GC-IMS)和电子鼻,被用于评估111个植物基饮品样本。主成分分析(PCA)和线性判别分析(LDA)被用于比较GC-IMS图库中的58个挥发性有机化合物区域以及电子鼻的63个肽传感器。PCA结果显示,GC-IMS仅能完全分离一个样本,而电子鼻能够完全分离七个样本。将LDA应用于GC-IMS分析时,分类准确率在15.4%至100%之间,而应用于电子鼻分析时,准确率在96.2%至100%之间。两种方法都有助于分类,但各有缺点,且电子鼻的表现略优于GC-IMS。本研究是最早比较GC-IMS和电子鼻用于分析植物基饮品的研究之一。有必要进一步开展研究以改进这些方法,并建立一个基于挥发性有机化合物的快速、经济高效的食品质量控制系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5932/11675735/61e081d59509/foods-13-04086-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验