Jeltsch Patrick, Monnin Killian, Jreige Mario, Fernandes-Mendes Lucia, Girardet Raphaël, Dromain Clarisse, Richiardi Jonas, Vietti-Violi Naik
Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Department of Radiology, South Metropolitan Health Service, Murdoch, WA 6150, Australia.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 11;14(24):2785. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242785.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) have spurred interest in developing computer-assisted analysis for imaging examinations. However, the lack of high-quality datasets remains a significant bottleneck. Labeling instructions are critical for improving dataset quality but are often lacking. This study aimed to establish a liver MRI segmentation protocol and assess its impact on annotation quality and inter-reader agreement.
This retrospective study included 20 patients with chronic liver disease. Manual liver segmentations were performed by a radiologist in training and a radiology technician on T2-weighted imaging (wi) and T1wi at the portal venous phase. Based on the inter-reader discrepancies identified after the first segmentation round, a segmentation protocol was established, guiding the second round of segmentation, resulting in a total of 160 segmentations. The Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) assessed inter-reader agreement pre- and post-protocol, with a Wilcoxon signed-rank test for per-volume analysis and an Aligned-Rank Transform (ART) for repeated measures analyses of variance (ANOVA) for per-slice analysis. Slice selection at extreme cranial or caudal liver positions was evaluated using the McNemar test.
The per-volume DSC significantly increased after protocol implementation for both T2wi ( < 0.001) and T1wi ( = 0.03). Per-slice DSC also improved significantly for both T2wi and T1wi ( < 0.001). The protocol reduced the number of liver segmentations with a non-annotated slice on T1wi ( = 0.04), but the change was not significant on T2wi ( = 0.16).
Establishing a liver MRI segmentation protocol improves annotation robustness and reproducibility, paving the way for advanced computer-assisted analysis. Moreover, segmentation protocols could be extended to other organs and lesions and incorporated into guidelines, thereby expanding the potential applications of AI in daily clinical practice.
背景/目的:人工智能(AI)的最新进展激发了人们对开发用于影像检查的计算机辅助分析的兴趣。然而,缺乏高质量的数据集仍然是一个重大瓶颈。标注指南对于提高数据集质量至关重要,但往往缺失。本研究旨在建立肝脏MRI分割方案,并评估其对标注质量和阅片者间一致性的影响。
这项回顾性研究纳入了20例慢性肝病患者。一名放射科住院医师和一名放射技师在门静脉期的T2加权成像(WI)和T1WI上进行肝脏手动分割。基于第一轮分割后发现的阅片者间差异,建立了分割方案,指导第二轮分割,共产生160次分割。Dice相似系数(DSC)用于评估方案前后阅片者间的一致性,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行每体积分析,采用对齐秩变换(ART)进行每切片分析的重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)。使用McNemar检验评估肝脏最头侧或最尾侧位置的切片选择。
对于T2WI(<0.001)和T1WI(=0.03),方案实施后每体积DSC均显著增加。T2WI和T1WI的每切片DSC也显著改善(<0.001)。该方案减少了T1WI上有未标注切片的肝脏分割数量(=0.04),但在T2WI上变化不显著(=0.16)。
建立肝脏MRI分割方案可提高标注的稳健性和可重复性,为先进的计算机辅助分析铺平道路。此外,分割方案可扩展到其他器官和病变,并纳入指南,从而扩大AI在日常临床实践中的潜在应用。