Cernasev Alina, Barenie Rachel, Hallam Hayleigh, Hohmeier Kenneth C, Forrest Shandra
College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 301 S. Perimeter Park Drive, Suite 220, Nashville, TN 37211, USA.
College of Pharmacy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 881 Madison Ave., Memphis, TN 38163, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Nov 21;21(12):1542. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121542.
A strong body of research has established stigma as a barrier to care for patients with substance use disorders (SUDs), which can lead to poorer patient outcomes. Prior qualitative research on healthcare practitioners' perceptions is limited. This study aimed to describe healthcare professional students' perceived roles in decreasing SUD stigma.
A qualitative design using focus groups (FGs) was employed. This study applied the stigma conceptualization approach by Link and Phelan to develop the FG guide, including labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination. These components are linked to the construction of cognitive categories that lead to stereotyped beliefs. The FG participants were graduate-level healthcare students recruited via email from the University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC). The research team analyzed the transcripts using Braun and Clarke's approach to identify emergent themes in the data. Dedoose Version 9.0.107, a qualitative data analysis software platform, was utilized to facilitate data manipulation and retrieval during the analysis. Steps were taken to ensure the reliability of the qualitative data using Lincoln and Guba's criteria.
Among thirty-one pharmacy and medical student participants, three themes emerged from the data: (1) student recognition of stigma, (2) the role of healthcare professionals in harm reduction, and (3) calls to enhance advocacy efforts to improve patient outcomes. These themes collectively encompass key members of the healthcare team's perceptions and solutions to SUD stigma.
This research reveals the importance of expanding training opportunities to go beyond the SUD disease state, to other evidence-based approaches such as effective advocacy, harm reduction, and stigma, which impact the delivery of that care.
大量研究已将耻辱感确立为物质使用障碍(SUDs)患者获得治疗的障碍,这可能导致患者预后较差。此前关于医疗从业者认知的定性研究有限。本研究旨在描述医疗专业学生在减少SUD耻辱感方面所感知到的作用。
采用焦点小组(FGs)的定性设计。本研究应用了Link和Phelan的耻辱感概念化方法来制定FG指南,包括标签化、刻板印象、隔离、地位丧失和歧视。这些成分与导致刻板信念的认知类别构建相关联。FG参与者是通过电子邮件从田纳西大学健康科学中心(UTHSC)招募的研究生水平的医疗专业学生。研究团队使用Braun和Clarke的方法分析转录本,以识别数据中出现的主题。使用定性数据分析软件平台Dedoose版本9.0.107来促进分析过程中的数据处理和检索。采取措施根据Lincoln和Guba的标准确保定性数据的可靠性。
在31名药学和医学专业学生参与者中,数据中出现了三个主题:(1)学生对耻辱感的认识,(2)医疗专业人员在减少伤害方面的作用,以及(3)呼吁加强宣传努力以改善患者预后。这些主题共同涵盖了医疗团队对SUD耻辱感的认知和解决方案的关键成员。
本研究揭示了扩大培训机会的重要性,培训内容应超越SUD疾病状态,涵盖其他基于证据的方法,如有效的宣传、减少伤害和耻辱感,这些会影响护理的提供。